No, this will not be a problem. TURN relays media based on RTP headers which
are unencrypted. SRTP encrypts only the payload of RTP packets. DTLS-SRTP is
one of the things mandatory to implement and support things in WebRTC, and it
will not speak RTP/AVP. Asterisk may have to unencrypt
Thanks for sharing this, Alex. It sounds like TURN, as a media repeater,
wouldn't work if the media must be secured (via SRTP). Is that right?
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, 3:17 pm alex epshteyn, wrote:
> WebRTC requires a few specific things to be in place. We have blog posts
> that talk about WebRTC
WebRTC requires a few specific things to be in place. We have blog posts that
talk about WebRTC based Thirdlane Connect, but most of the information applies
to WebRTC applications in general.
https://www.thirdlane.com/blog/get-up-and-running-with-thirdlane-connect
@Olivior
I agree that seting up WebRTC is hard, however when done it is smooth to
use. For replication you can build RPMs with working configurations.
Regarding stability, it is not being used widly, so can't say it is mature.
However we have no complain so far regarding audio or connectivity.
@Nasir:
Thanks for replying here.
Did you met in your deployments, the kind of stability issues Carlos
reported earlier ?
Le sam. 29 sept. 2018 à 13:32, Nasir Iqbal a
écrit :
> Hi Olivior,
>
> We have recently worked on a WebRTC based agent panel. As based on my
> experience I think that
Hi Olivior,
We have recently worked on a WebRTC based agent panel. As based on my
experience I think that WebRTC based phones are far better and cheaper then
those soft / sip phone. the big plus is that they are easy to customize and
developer can use the power of browser and web to build / offer
On 9/26/18 10:20 AM, Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:40 AM Carlos Chavez wrote:
On 9/26/2018 4:46 AM, Olivier wrote:
Hello,
This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative
to softphone deployment.
For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount
Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 16:40, Carlos Chavez a écrit :
> On 9/26/2018 4:46 AM, Olivier wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative
> > to softphone deployment.
> >
> > For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount of work needed for
> >
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:40 AM Carlos Chavez wrote:
>
> On 9/26/2018 4:46 AM, Olivier wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative
> > to softphone deployment.
> >
> > For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount of work needed for
> >
On 9/26/2018 4:46 AM, Olivier wrote:
Hello,
This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative
to softphone deployment.
For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount of work needed for
installation and configuration.
Also, Softphones must be carefully choosen if
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, at 6:46 AM, Olivier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative to
> softphone deployment.
>
> For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount of work needed for
> installation and configuration.
> Also, Softphones must be
Hello,
This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative to
softphone deployment.
For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount of work needed for
installation and configuration.
Also, Softphones must be carefully choosen if Deskphone-like quality is
expected.
Now that
12 matches
Mail list logo
