On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:39:44 -0600, Bob Smither <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>After some frustrating times, I began to suspect the cards. Doing more
>careful testing, keeping track of the cards, confirmed that two of four
>cards I was trying had problems.
I had the same issue with three brand new,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:39:44PM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> One last question if someone has an answer - Using Kwelstart signaling *
> can detect incoming calls and can detect hang ups, but doesn't seem to
> be able to detect when an outgoing (over a Zap channel) call is
> answered. Is this co
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 17:47 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 08:38:31AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 07:27 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >
> > > Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on
> > > lspci. If this is so: the problem
On Wednesday 26 December 2007 12:37:19 Bob Smither wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 10:22 -0500, dave cantera wrote:
> > bob,
> >
> > look on p20 of 'the book' edition 2, or p16 edition 1
> > this explains the 3.3v vs 5.0v issue with motherboard slots
> >
> > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596510
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 10:22 -0500, dave cantera wrote:
> bob,
>
> look on p20 of 'the book' edition 2, or p16 edition 1
> this explains the 3.3v vs 5.0v issue with motherboard slots
>
> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596510480/
> daveC
The slots are 5V PCI on both motherboards. The X100P ca
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 08:38:31AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 07:27 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> > Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on
> > lspci. If this is so: the problem is not with Zaptel - it is below.
> > Zaptel doesn't even get a ch
bob,
look on p20 of 'the book' edition 2, or p16 edition 1
this explains the 3.3v vs 5.0v issue with motherboard slots
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596510480/
daveC
Bob Smither wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 15:46 +1000, Mattt wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a PCI bus version issue ;-)
>>
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 15:46 +1000, Mattt wrote:
> Sounds like a PCI bus version issue ;-)
Thanks Matt, but could you elaborate? The card supposedly supports both
5 and 3.3 volt PCI slots, and the slots on the older system that works
with the card appear the same as on the board giving me grief.
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 07:27 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on
> lspci. If this is so: the problem is not with Zaptel - it is below.
> Zaptel doesn't even get a chance.
Thanks Tzafrir. The last thing I tried was to downgrade Zaptel
December 2007 3:28 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 08:41:21PM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
>
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 08:41:21PM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > > > Does it show up in 'lspci'?
> > >
> > > No -
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > > Does it show up in 'lspci'?
> >
> > No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show
> > th
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > Does it show up in 'lspci'?
>
> No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show
> the card. There are several unused interrupts.
So until you see it t
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Does it show up in 'lspci'?
No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show
the card. There are several unused interrupts.
I should have included earlier:
Zaptel 1.4.7.1
Thanks.
--
Bob Smither, PhD
Does it show up in 'lspci'?
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Bob Smither wrote:
> I am out of things to try on getting an X100P card to work.
>
> I have a P4 system with CentOS 5.1 installed (network install). After
> adding required packages I compiled (apparently successful) and
> installed Zaptel in ant
I am out of things to try on getting an X100P card to work.
I have a P4 system with CentOS 5.1 installed (network install). After
adding required packages I compiled (apparently successful) and
installed Zaptel in anticipation of installing Asterisk.
I simply cannot get the X100P card to be reco
16 matches
Mail list logo
