Have you tried finish the dialed number with "#"?
I'm not sure if this is working on your setup but this is one workaround
that we give to our users when they initially complain about big delays on
SIP phones (where we have not changed yet the default dialplan).
HTH,
Ioan.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chad Wallace
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:05 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 1:57 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
My example is not _X. it is _X It is there to catch single digit misdials.
The only line in my example with a . is the _[24-9].
July 11, 2013 12:22 PM To: Asterisk Users
> Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re:
> [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
>
> The catch alls do not catch 1+ or 3+ calls. Look carefully at it.
> Therefore there will not be a delay.
>
> -Original Messag
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
They won't catch, no (because of priority), but they do match, which is enough
to trigger the 3 second timeout instead of the 8 second. So, if you pickup and
dial 1, then you will only get 3 seconds (instead of 8) to type in the
ehalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 12:22 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
The catch alls do not catch 1+ or 3+ calls. Look carefully at it. Therefore
there will not be a delay.
-Original Me
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
Right, but when you type any of those, there's only a 3 second inter-digit
timeout because EVERYTHING is a match of the catch-all. There is no excessive
delay, but instead a del
lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:34 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
This issue is simple dialplan management, which applies to any PBX. This is
something every PBX ad
n-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
No, I understand - maybe I'm not explaining myself well.
Yes, I can change the source so that pattern-matched input delays 8 seconds
instead of 3, but then the users have to wait 8 seconds for every number they
dial (even
.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:48 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
You seem to be confused.
If you want to change the dialing timeouts on Asterisk analog channels, then
you
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
So my only two options then are:
1) Have the timeout be so short that users complain (but they get a fancy
message).
2) The timeouts are reasonable, but when they're wrong the users get a busy
signal (no fancy me
Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:51 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
Okay, so I is no good. Does anybody else have a work-around for this?
-Justin
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
Okay, so I is no good. Does anybody else have a work-around for this?
-Justin
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
"I" has the same limitations as dialplan timeouts, you have to be in a
Background or WaitExten or similar for them to work.These items are
designed for IVRS.
-Original Message-
From: aste
On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:40 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
It seems likely that this is exactly what is happening. I'd rather not change
the code though, but rather f
Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:12 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:
> From chan_dahdi.c, don't know if it applies to your situation or not.
>
> /*! \brief Wait up to 16 seconds for first digit (FXO logic) */
> static int firstdigittimeout = 16000;
>
> /*! \brief How long to wait for following digits (FXO logic)
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
So then, by saying "If the digits already dialed match an extension in the
dialplan...wait 3 seconds...", then we're saying that asterisk has found a
match, and the mat
ehalf Of Richard Mudgett
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 10:22 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Justin Killen
mailto:jkil...@allamericanasphalt.com>> wrote:
I have an instal
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Justin Killen <
jkil...@allamericanasphalt.com> wrote:
> I have an installation that has analog phones connected via T1 channel
> banks. I’m getting complaints from users that they will enter a partial
> number (eg 91213), then turn away to get the next few digit
: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:50 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
Okay, after enabling DTMF
awn extension
(from-internal, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/96-1'
[2013-07-10 09:22:46] VERBOSE[12753][C-0002ec16] sig_analog.c: -- Hanging
up on 'DAHDI/96-1'
[2013-07-10 09:22:46] VERBOSE[12753][C-0002ec16] chan_dahdi.c: -- Hungup
'DAHDI/96-1'
-Justin
-
risk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 11:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Justin Killen wrote:
> I ha
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Justin Killen wrote:
I have an installation that has analog phones connected via T1 channel
banks. I’m getting complaints from users that they will enter a partial
number (eg 91213), then turn away to get the next few digits, and the
system will start dialing before they h
The channel banks are Adtran TA-624's using ESF/B8ZS. When a handset is picked
up, I can see the offhook in the asterisk console, so it looks that the channel
is immediately connected through the channel bank (not delayed until after
digits are dialed), so it looks that overlap dialing isn't
08, 2013 10:21 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay
Have a look at the documentation of the channel bank. I guess some kind of
overlap dialing is
enabled, which is typically associated with a timeout value.
Have a look at the documentation of the channel bank. I guess some kind of overlap dialing is
enabled, which is typically associated with a timeout value. chan_dahdi.conf also has entries
like this.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Coloca
I have an installation that has analog phones connected via T1 channel banks.
I'm getting complaints from users that they will enter a partial number (eg
91213), then turn away to get the next few digits, and the system will start
dialing before they have a chance to put in the rest of the dial
28 matches
Mail list logo
