On Wednesday 01 November 2017 at 12:15:08, Michael Maier wrote:
> On 11/01/2017 at 10:14 AM Antony Stone wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 November 2017 at 08:10:36, Michael Maier wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm facing the following scenario:
> >>
> >> - Initial call opened to asterisk: SDP g722,alaw,ulaw
> >>
>
On 11/01/2017 at 10:14 AM Antony Stone wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 November 2017 at 08:10:36, Michael Maier wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm facing the following scenario:
>>
>> - Initial call opened to asterisk: SDP g722,alaw,ulaw
>>
>> - Outgoing call to provider started with Invite / SDP alaw, g726 an
On 11/01/2017 10:14, Antony Stone wrote:
>
> If you don't have a G.729 licence, don't offer G.729 to the peer.
AFAIK the g729 patents have expired or are granted royalty free for the
holder's declaration:
http://www.sipro.com/G729.html
--
Guido Falsi
--
_
On Wednesday 01 November 2017 at 08:10:36, Michael Maier wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm facing the following scenario:
>
> - Initial call opened to asterisk: SDP g722,alaw,ulaw
>
> - Outgoing call to provider started with Invite / SDP alaw, g726 and
> g729.
So, you're claiming to the provider that
Hello!
I'm facing the following scenario:
- Initial call opened to asterisk: SDP g722,alaw,ulaw
- Outgoing call to provider started with Invite / SDP alaw, g726 and
g729.
- Provider sends 183 Session progress SDP: g729, alaw
- Provider sends g729 rtp packages
But: there is no license to tr
