Hi,
Appreciate everyone for your valuable inputs. All these inputs provided by
you are really useful.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Patkar
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Joi
On Tuesday 13 Mar 2012, Amit Patkar | Avhan Technologies Pvt Ltd wrote:
> Thank for your views. Where as no one is ready to share real numbers.
> I am looking at benchmarks so that I can plan for resources.
> Since asterisk project is active for so many years, I was expecting
> some published numbe
Am 13.03.2012 21:13, schrieb Steve Edwards:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Amit Patkar | Avhan Technologies Pvt Ltd wrote:
>
>> [Amit Patkar] I completely agree with you on distributing the load. At
>> the same time, I am looking at juicing hardware as well. Can you share
>> the number instead of saying c
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Amit Patkar | Avhan Technologies Pvt Ltd wrote:
[Amit Patkar] I completely agree with you on distributing the load. At
the same time, I am looking at juicing hardware as well. Can you share
the number instead of saying couple hundreds?
In the universe of possible configur
From: "Kevin P. Fleming"
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:02 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Capacity of single instance of Asterisk
On 03/13/2012 09:43 AM, Amit Patkar | Avhan Technologies Pvt Ltd wrote
On 03/13/2012 09:43 AM, Amit Patkar | Avhan Technologies Pvt Ltd wrote:
Thank for your views. Where as no one is ready to share real numbers. I am
looking at benchmarks so that I can plan for resources.
Since asterisk project is active for so many years, I was expecting some
published numbers.
Hi Kevin,
Thank for your views. Where as no one is ready to share real numbers. I am
looking at benchmarks so that I can plan for resources.
Since asterisk project is active for so many years, I was expecting some
published numbers.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Patkar
On 03/12/2012 03:38 PM, Steve E
Hi Steve
Thanks for your input. Please check my comments.
> I have a server with 24 cores running at 2.4ghz and 16 GB RAM. How
> many concurrent SIP sessions I can run from single instance of
> Asterisk on this server? I wish to use G711 codec with echo cancel.
> And all calls needs to be reco
On 03/12/2012 03:38 PM, Steve Edwards wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Amit Patkar wrote:
What will be impact on no of session when G729a is used?
Assuming that transcoding is involved; if all the system is doing is
passing through G.729A media streams, and recording them in unmixed
G.729A form
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Amit Patkar wrote:
I have a server with 24 cores running at 2.4ghz and 16 GB RAM. How many
concurrent SIP sessions I can run from single instance of Asterisk on
this server? I wish to use G711 codec with echo cancel. And all calls
needs to be recorded.
What kind of capac
-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Amit Patkar
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 2:04 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Capacity of single instance of Asterisk
Hi
Can someome give tested and proven information on Asterisk capabilities?
I have a server with 24 cores
Hi
Can someome give tested and proven information on Asterisk capabilities?
I have a server with 24 cores running at 2.4ghz and 16 GB RAM. How many
concurrent SIP sessions I can run from single instance of Asterisk on this
server? I wish to use G711 codec with echo cancel. And all calls need
, 2008 1:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] capacity
I use standard wav (most compatible with players) so about a meg a minute.
In my experience, most people (users) use their voicemail similar to
email, they keep everything. Especially
I use standard wav (most compatible with players) so about a meg a minute.
In my experience, most people (users) use their voicemail similar to
email, they keep everything. Especially love struck college kids. I
think Asterisk has a soft limit of 1,000 (maybe it is 999) messages as
the max per i
Our office averages around 1.5MB / mailbox, call it 10MB for rounding.
6,000 x 10MB = 60GB (n'est pas?)
2 x 250GB drives, mirrored, should cover that and the system quite nicely.
regards,
Drew
Disclaimer: Most of our employees are programmers so probably don't have
any friends to call and lea
RAID arguments (preference really) aside, 4k - 6k worth of student
voicemails is going to require quite a bit of storage space.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Drew Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having ventured high enough and far enough to view the curvature of the
>
Having ventured high enough and far enough to view the curvature of the
Earth and having stayed up late enough long enough (why do disks only
fail at the weekend?) to rebuild and restore RAID 5 sets, I proffer the
following (not so) Humble Opinion .
Dual power supplies, two thumbs up
but R
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:36, Steve Totaro wrote:
> And I can post a link that shows a bunch of guys think the earth is
> flat with a 5/10 google ranking also (like the barf guys).
> http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm
>
Steve,
My purpose was to try to point out th
And I can post a link that shows a bunch of guys think the earth is
flat with a 5/10 google ranking also (like the barf guys).
http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm
I usually just call my guy at CDW and give him my needs, he is a
former techie gone sales. He puts togeth
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:12, Steve Totaro wrote:
> For your use, I would go for a RAID 5
I would highly recommend against a raid 5 set. I can give you more details if
you are interested, but these guys have most if it down : www.baarf.com see
the link on the left on "why should I not use Raid
no more than 10 simultaneously.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:05 PM
>> To: Asterisk Users Mailing L
f Steve Totaro
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:05 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] capacity
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Eve-Ellen Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> &g
ltaneously.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:05 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] capacity
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Eve-Ellen Cole <[EM
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Eve-Ellen Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am planning to deploy an Asterisk system to supply 4-6,000 students with
> voicemail capabilities. The system will be set up with non-DIDs, route
> incoming calls to voicemail, then send an email noti
Hi,
I am planning to deploy an Asterisk system to supply 4-6,000 students with
voicemail capabilities. The system will be set up with non-DIDs, route
incoming calls to voicemail, then send an email notification. Anyone with
some ideas on how I should go about spec'ing the server this use?
Hi Matt,
The best use I have seen is the newly converted IAX2 which can use
multithreading in version 1.4, the beta of which should be released
later this week.
The best idea would be to compile Asterisk, run some tests (show
translation recalc 60) with HT turned on, restart the box, bring it u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Phillips wrote:
> What tools are you using for this?
>
> I'm sure you are aware of SIPp but wondered if you had anything else?
>
> Mark
For IAX2 internally we use a modified version of testcall from
http://iaxclient.sf.net.
Otherwise we just
What tools are you using for this?
I'm sure you are aware of SIPp but wondered if you had anything else?
Mark
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 21:41 +0200, Matt Riddell (IT) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> RR wrote:
> > Hi matt,
> >
> > sorry this might be a stupid question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RR wrote:
> Hi matt,
>
> sorry this might be a stupid question but is a bit pertinent to me,
> I'd asked something similar in one of my last email regarding SMP. Do
> you know if (*) is capable of making use of HT support i.e is
> multi-threaded and i
Hi matt,
sorry this might be a stupid question but is a bit pertinent to me,
I'd asked something similar in one of my last email regarding SMP. Do
you know if (*) is capable of making use of HT support i.e is
multi-threaded and improves performance for operations like
transcoding? Is that a valid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kokfoo Soo wrote:
> Does anyone know how many active channels can support for transcoding ulaw to
> G729 by using 4x 3.6GHz Xeon Processors?
In one machine?
I'd guess at around 200-300 absolute max if the calls are spread evenly
across CPUs.
Normal
Does anyone know how many active channels can support for transcoding ulaw to G729 by using 4x 3.6GHz Xeon Processors?Thanks,
Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provide
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] capacity testing
Jesse,
Thanks
for your feedback.
1. I
am running kernel 2.4.18.3 with linux 7.3, please let me know which version of
Redhat are you running on and which kernel are you running, I wonder if that
could make a difference too. I am surprised that
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] capacity testing
1)
Yes, I did get that. I've never seen a segmentation fault message, but that
should be b/c I've been running the process in the background since it is
obviously seg-faulting. I believe you are also correct that most people are not
try
ly released?
jesse
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 1/15/2004 10:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] capacity testing
Jesse Peterson wrote:
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] capacity testing
ï
Hi
all, and Jesse
1. So,
you did get the experience of crashing all of a sudden with the "Disconnected
from Asterisk server" error message. I got both this and the segmentation error
when crashing. I am running the version of asteri
Jesse Peterson wrote:
I am currently running Asterisk 0.5.0 under Redhat 9 on a single PIII 800 with 256megs RAM.
CVS UPDATE! That code is hardcore old.
Jeremy McNamara
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/m
ities to share with others.
Thanks !
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jesse
Peterson
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 2:40 PM
To: Asterisk-Users (E-mail)
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] capacity testing
Hello all. I'm new to asterisk and ha
extension (yes, extensions.conf) that would allow me to route
any number to it.
jesse
-Original Message-
From: Alastair Maw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 1/15/2004 5:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] capacity testing
On 15/01/04 19:39, Jesse
> I am
> rather
> curious as to why I seem to be using up all memory although I am not
> running
> any unnecessary processes, or should I actually disable all modules,
> other
> than really necessary ones to support VOIP?
Do you mean that Asterisk is using up all of your memory
or that all of you
THat's not bad 20 calls through a 800Mhz P3. I new 3Ghz P4
could likely handle 60 then. Not bad.
But don't beleive "top". First off if acverages. Think for
a minute. We all kow a CPU can never by "20% in use" it is either
in an idle loop (at 0%) or doing real work (100%) it can't be
in an in-
2004 2:40 PM
To: Asterisk-Users (E-mail)
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] capacity testing
Hello all. I'm new to asterisk and have been using and testing it for about
a week now. My initial hope has been to use it as a sip<->h323 gateway to
tie SIP & H323 based ip phones together with m
On 15/01/04 19:39, Jesse Peterson wrote:
#0 ast_smoother_feed (s=0xcbf90080, f=0x5de5c4a8) at frame.c:72
#1 0x41eb00b1 in oh323_write (c=0x8214488, f=0x5de5c4a8) at chan_oh323.c:1504
Do you experience the same problems when you use the other (bundled)
h323 driver? (asterisk/channels/h323/README
Hello all. I'm new to asterisk and have been using and testing it for about a week
now. My initial hope has been to use it as a sip<->h323 gateway to tie SIP & H323
based ip phones together with my Cisco AS5300 and Lucent MaxTNT/MVAM networks.
I am currently running Asterisk 0.5.0 under Redhat 9
44 matches
Mail list logo
