Perssy Llamosas wrote:
I doubt it.
hxxp://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/02/opensuse-103-release/
I think that is the sort of thing the OP would classify as religious
grounds.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.
Apart from religious grounds (!), is there any pros or cons why I should
choose one over the other for a new install of asterisk ?
Julian
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:22:24PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just 5 months ago CENTOS started to use Linux 2.6
Centos 4 (based on RHEL4) used kernel 2.6 as well.
It was released over two years ago (it has 2.6.9).
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755
I'm sorry I call bullshit on this one. CentOS has been 2.6 for some
time.
/b
On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just 5 months ago CENTOS started to use Linux 2.6 one of the
reasons I'd abandoned for SuSE a while back.
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Apart from religious grounds (!), is there any pros or cons why I
should choose one over the other for a new install of asterisk ?
I doubt it. A distro is a distro.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
We use only openSUSE.
___
On 10/18/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apart from religious grounds (!), is there any pros or cons why I should
choose one over the other for a new install of asterisk ?
Julian
SuSE is known for using the latest packages with each release, and
RHEL/CENTOS are known for
On 10/18/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:22:24PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just 5 months ago CENTOS started to use Linux 2.6
Centos 4 (based on RHEL4) used kernel 2.6 as well.
It was released over two years ago (it has 2.6.9).
Never trust
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 06:25:39PM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Apart from religious grounds (!), is there any pros or cons why I
should choose one over the other for a new install of asterisk ?
I doubt it. A distro is a distro.
Well, no.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
We
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 06:25:39PM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Apart from religious grounds (!), is there any pros or cons why I
should choose one over the other for a new install of asterisk ?
I doubt it. A distro is a distro.
Well, no.
I doubt it.
hxxp://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/02/opensuse-103-release/
Original Message
Subject: Re:[asterisk-users] centos 5 vs OpenSuse 10.3
From: Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: 18/10/2007 11:25 a.m.
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:54:36PM -0500, Perssy Llamosas wrote:
I doubt it.
hxxp://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/02/opensuse-103-release/
The above page (even with the proper protocol name) is very low on
actual facts and reasonings. It mentions nothing specific to openSUSE
10.3 .
So let's get
I doubt it.
boycottnovell.com/2007/10/02/opensuse-103-release/
Original Message
Subject: Re:[asterisk-users] centos 5 vs OpenSuse 10.3
From: Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: 18/10/2007 11:25 a.m.
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Apart
I doubt it.
boycottnovell.com/2007/10/02/opensuse-103-release
Original Message
Subject: Re:[asterisk-users] centos 5 vs OpenSuse 10.3
From: Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: 18/10/2007 11:25 a.m.
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Apart
] centos 5 vs OpenSuse 10.3
I doubt it.
hxxp://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/02/opensuse-103-release/
Original Message
Subject: Re:[asterisk-users] centos 5 vs OpenSuse 10.3
From: Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: 18/10/2007 11:25 a.m
We used to use CentOS 4 here but about 6-8 months ago we found that
they were too slow with updates their repos for some of the 3rd party
software that we were developing. We switched to SuSe 10.2 and haven't
looked back. However Asterisk works equally well on both. Just pick your
15 matches
Mail list logo
