Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-12-14 Thread Warren Selby
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Jonathan Thurman wrote: > > > Any chance that 64 bit Linux will be supported? > > There is a small chance; I've done some work in the past week while > traveling to attempt solve the 64-bit problems, and I fixed some of them > but not all

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-11-11 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Jonathan Thurman wrote: > Any chance that 64 bit Linux will be supported? There is a small chance; I've done some work in the past week while traveling to attempt solve the 64-bit problems, and I fixed some of them but not all of them, so it still won't successfully FAX on a 64-bit machine. I'll

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-11-11 Thread Jonathan Thurman
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Scott L. Lykens wrote: > >> Any progress on new Fax for Asterisk modules? Last update here was >> October 19 as quoted above; Original discussion is now over six weeks >> old. FAA Download Selector still shows modules for 1.6.1.4 as the la

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-11-11 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Scott L. Lykens wrote: > Any progress on new Fax for Asterisk modules? Last update here was > October 19 as quoted above; Original discussion is now over six weeks > old. FAA Download Selector still shows modules for 1.6.1.4 as the latest > available. Yes, there has been progress. The new modules

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-11-11 Thread Scott L. Lykens
e: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19? > > Any update on the new FFA modules, as this was two weeks ago? > > Yeah... AstriCon got in the way :-) > > This is on my agenda for this afternoon, so hopefully we'll see some > progress shortly. Any prog

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-10-19 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
st - Non-Commercial Discussion >> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19? > >>> Any update on when the new FFA modules will be out? >> Still working on fixing bugs. Hopefully tomorrow. > > Any update on the new FFA modules, as this was t

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-10-19 Thread Scott L. Lykens
e: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19? > > Any update on when the new FFA modules will be out? > > Still working on fixing bugs. Hopefully tomorrow. Any update on the new FFA modules, as this was two weeks ago? Thanks. sl _

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-10-05 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Scott L. Lykens wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- >> boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming > >> I am working on getting this situation resolved and should have new >> releases of FFA out at the end of thi

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-10-05 Thread Scott L. Lykens
> -Original Message- > From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming > I am working on getting this situation resolved and should have new > releases of FFA out at the end of this week, but in the meantime if

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-09-29 Thread Trevor Peirce
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Where would you suggest this note be placed? We've tried to make our > documentation as clear as possible that the download selector is the > canonical place to get the proper FFA modules for any given version of > Asterisk, and the fact that the newer versions of Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-09-29 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Trevor Peirce wrote: > A note somewhere would have been nice explaining this. I recently tried > the Digium Fax to determine if a client should buy some licenses, but > after seeing it reject invites for T.38 on incoming calls and never try > to switch for outgoing, I figured it was just broken

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-09-29 Thread Trevor Peirce
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > I am working on getting this situation resolved and should have new > releases of FFA out at the end of this week, but in the meantime if you > want to use FFA with T.38 support you'll have to use one of the versions > of Asterisk listed on the download selector page. >

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-09-29 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Scott L. Lykens wrote: > As we are eliminating our PRI soon I am trying to get faxing via T.38 working > properly. I'm not interested in running Callweaver next to Asterisk just to > support fax. :/ > > Any insight into this error would be greatly appreciated. This is occurring because the cu

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-09-29 Thread Scott L. Lykens
e: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19? > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:26 PM, sean darcy > wrote: > > In my attempts to set up digium fax I get an odd warning: > > > >     -- Executing [...@capture-fax:2] ReceiveFAX("SIP/173-b53023e8", &

Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-09-21 Thread David Backeberg
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:26 PM, sean darcy wrote: > In my attempts to set up digium fax I get an odd warning: > >     -- Executing [...@capture-fax:2] ReceiveFAX("SIP/173-b53023e8", > "/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif") in new stack >     -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' receiving fax > '/v

[asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?

2009-09-21 Thread sean darcy
In my attempts to set up digium fax I get an odd warning: -- Executing [...@capture-fax:2] ReceiveFAX("SIP/173-b53023e8", "/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif") in new stack -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' receiving fax '/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif' [Sep 21 18:06:37]