Re: [asterisk-users] more than 32 callgroups & pickupgroups

2006-12-22 Thread Pavel Jezek
this limitation still persist in 1.4 or trunk? if yes, it should be really improved... imagine, even small companies have more than 32 offices, i.e. callgroups, where phone call pickups are needed. John Harragin wrote: callgroups & pickupgroups greater than 31 are not working for sip calls w

Re: [asterisk-users] more than 32 callgroups & pickupgroups

2006-12-22 Thread Leo Ann Boon
Conrad Wood wrote: On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 12:07 -0700, Douglas Garstang wrote: I'm no C programmer, but is this 32 limit just an array definition somewhere? Wouldn't it be a no brainer to track it down and increase it so some very large number? I think pickupgroup is defined as 'uns

RE: [asterisk-users] more than 32 callgroups & pickupgroups

2006-12-21 Thread Conrad Wood
source a bit more to see how exactly it's accessed (I didn't!) I don't know any .>32bit integers on 32bit machines. > > -Original Message- > > From: John Harragin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 11:56 AM > >

RE: [asterisk-users] more than 32 callgroups & pickupgroups

2006-12-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
2006 11:56 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] more than 32 callgroups & pickupgroups > > > callgroups & pickupgroups greater than 31 are not working for > sip calls > with 1.2.14 tarball.

[asterisk-users] more than 32 callgroups & pickupgroups

2006-12-21 Thread John Harragin
callgroups & pickupgroups greater than 31 are not working for sip calls with 1.2.14 tarball. Anyone know which branches support 64? John ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update opti