- "Dovid Bender" wrote:
| - Original Message -
| From: "--[ UxBoD ]--"
| To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
|
| Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:32
| Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MPG123 Dying
|
|
|
- "Dovid Bender" wrote:
| - Original Message -
| From: "--[ UxBoD ]--"
| To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
|
| Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:32
| Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MPG123 Dying
|
|
|
- "--[ UxBoD ]--" wrote:
| - "Dovid Bender" wrote:
|
| | - Original Message -
| | From: "Trevor Peirce"
| | To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
| |
| | Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 23:14
| | Su
- Original Message -
From: "--[ UxBoD ]--"
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:32
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MPG123 Dying
> - "Dovid Bender" wrote:
>
> | - Original
- "Dovid Bender" wrote:
| - Original Message -
| From: "Trevor Peirce"
| To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
|
| Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 23:14
| Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MPG123 Dying
|
|
| > --[ UxBoD ]--
, October 07, 2009 12:57 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MPG123 Dying
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Peirce"
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 20
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Peirce"
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 23:14
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MPG123 Dying
> --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
>> Please how do I stop the following ???
&
- "Trevor Peirce" wrote:
| --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
| > Please how do I stop the following ???
| >
| > Asterisk ended with exit status 127
| > Asterisk died with code 127.
| > Automatically restarting Asterisk.
| > mpg123: no process killed
| >
|
| You figure out why asterisk is crashing. :)
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> Please how do I stop the following ???
>
> Asterisk ended with exit status 127
> Asterisk died with code 127.
> Automatically restarting Asterisk.
> mpg123: no process killed
>
You figure out why asterisk is crashing. :)
This has nothing to do with mpg123, which is just
Of --[ UxBoD ]--
Sent: 2009 m. spalio 6 d. 23:02
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] MPG123 Dying
Please how do I stop the following ???
Asterisk ended with exit status 127
Asterisk died with code 127.
Automatically restarting Asterisk.
mpg123: no process killed
Best
@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] MPG123 Dying
Please how do I stop the following ???
Asterisk ended with exit status 127
Asterisk died with code 127.
Automatically restarting Asterisk.
mpg123: no process killed
Best Regards,
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content and
Please how do I stop the following ???
Asterisk ended with exit status 127
Asterisk died with code 127.
Automatically restarting Asterisk.
mpg123: no process killed
Best Regards,
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content and is believed to be clean.
SplatNIX IT Servi
Hey,
I recently deployed a box with a dialplan that needs to play mp3's. I
had mpg123 on it and I'm using MP3Player to play the mp3s. However when
I test now instead of the mp3's being played I get a piano like melody.
It goes like bing bing bing, don don don, etc like someone doing
repetition of
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:06:00PM +0200, Stefan Tichy wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:24:22AM -0700, fateme fatah wrote:
> > I want to install mpg123-0.59r on my asterisk server.I downloaded it in
> > /usr/src then untared it and I typed these command :
>
> Just have a look at www.mpg123.org
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:24:22AM -0700, fateme fatah wrote:
> I want to install mpg123-0.59r on my asterisk server.I downloaded it in
> /usr/src then untared it and I typed these command :
Just have a look at www.mpg123.org and fetch the up to date version.
0.59r is probably available with your
I'm guessing you're using gentoo. Your LDFLAGS ended up being
backslash. Don't do that, and it will probably build. I'm making an
educated guess, based on your 'omit-frame-pointer'. Don't omit your
frame pointer either, if you ever want help debugging. Go into
/etc/make.conf, find the gentoo docs,
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:24:22AM -0700, fateme fatah wrote:
> Hi:
>
>
> I want to install mpg123-0.59r on my asterisk server.I downloaded it in
> /usr/src then untared it and I typed these command :
>
BTW: why do you want to use mpg123?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755
fateme fatah wrote:
> Hi:
> I want to install mpg123-0.59r on my asterisk server.I downloaded it
> in /usr/src then untared it and I typed these command :
> #cd /usr/src/mpg123-0.59r
> #make linux
> after run make linux ,I saw 2 errors in terminal:
> make CC=gcc LDFLAGS= \
> OBJECTS='decode_i386.o
Hi:
I want to install mpg123-0.59r on my asterisk server.I downloaded it in
/usr/src then untared it and I typed these command :
#cd /usr/src/mpg123-0.59r
#make linux
after run make linux ,I saw 2 errors in terminal:
make CC=gcc LDFLAGS= \
OBJECTS='decode_i386.o dct64_
On Sunday 11 November 2007 01:38, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 01:40:23PM -0600, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
> > Thomas Winter wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Iam running debian etch on thecus n2100 (Xscale 80219)
> > > I do not have MoH because standard mpg123 gives only loud noise.
> >
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 01:40:23PM -0600, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
> Thomas Winter wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Iam running debian etch on thecus n2100 (Xscale 80219)
> > I do not have MoH because standard mpg123 gives only loud noise.
> >
> > I can not compile mpg123 from asterisk because of option -m
On Saturday 10 November 2007 20:40, Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote:
> Thomas Winter wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Iam running debian etch on thecus n2100 (Xscale 80219)
> > I do not have MoH because standard mpg123 gives only loud noise.
> >
> > I can not compile mpg123 from asterisk because of option -m486.
Thomas Winter wrote:
> Hi,
> Iam running debian etch on thecus n2100 (Xscale 80219)
> I do not have MoH because standard mpg123 gives only loud noise.
>
> I can not compile mpg123 from asterisk because of option -m486.
>
> Any way to get MoH running on this board.
What version of Asterisk?
Aste
Hi,
Iam running debian etch on thecus n2100 (Xscale 80219)
I do not have MoH because standard mpg123 gives only loud noise.
I can not compile mpg123 from asterisk because of option -m486.
Any way to get MoH running on this board.
___
--Bandwidth and Co
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:20:45PM -0500, Eddie Johnson Jr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Wanted to know if it also works in debian flavor of Liunx.
http://packages.debian.org/mpg123 : already in unstable and in Etch.
I don't see any backport in backports.org, though. Sarge has 0.59r with
security fixes.
Hello,
Wanted to know if it also works in debian flavor of Liunx.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Liu
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:48 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] mpg123 new version
Hi
Hi there,
It seems mpg123 is now maintained again and there are a few new
version released. The latest is 0.61. Does asterisk work with the
newer versions? What audio options shall we use when compile mpg123
v0.61?
Thanks!
Frank
___
--Bandwidth and Co
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:53:01PM +0200, Giordano Grandis wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm using * 1.0.9 which use mpg123 for music on hold. But sometimes
> starts eating up a lot of CPU.
> I sthere any alternative method to use moh without use mpg123?
> I tryied this http://astrecipes.net/?n=152 but i does
Hi
all,
I'm using * 1.0.9
which use mpg123 for music on hold. But sometimes starts eating up a lot of
CPU.
I sthere any
alternative method to use moh without use mpg123?
I tryied this http://astrecipes.net/?n=152 but i
doesn't wotks for me.
Anyone can help me
pls ?
Thanks in
advance.
Matt Roth wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
Please let us know your results. I cannot really test this in
production system since it is a $16,000/hr call center. I was using
madplay but it was crashing and creating zombie processes, I figured
native was not the way to go since all of the different
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:03 -0400, Matt Roth wrote:
> mpg123 has the same problem with zombie processes as you were
> experiencing with MadPlay. For a scalable system, native MOH is the way
> to go. As per Kevin Fleming, it only introduces a slight memory
> overhead. mpg123 consumes CPU cycle
Steve Totaro wrote:
Please let us know your results. I cannot really test this in
production system since it is a $16,000/hr call center. I was using
madplay but it was crashing and creating zombie processes, I figured
native was not the way to go since all of the different audio
streams.
Erick Perez wrote:
Are there any good scripts to stress test MoH?
I want to test this machine for 1000 "calls" on hold.
Steve Totaro wrote:
When I say high, I mean 1,000+ calls.
Erick and Steve,
You both speak of Asterisk systems capable of handling 1,000 calls. I
currently have a Dell
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 or asterisk
Can't you use mpg123 as compiled under x86_32? I do on a few servers I
have. I found madplay better process wise than mpg123.
Regards
Lee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
06 08:29
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 or asterisk
Can MAD crash a server like mpg123 can?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Archer
Sent: Tuesday, 30 May
Can MAD crash a server like mpg123 can?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Archer
Sent: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 5:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 or asterisk
Can&#
iling List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 or asterisk
Well, being unable to compile mpg123 under x86_64 i installed lame and
transformed the mp3-->wav-->raw.
and using "files" as the format player.
Are there any good scripts to stress test MoH
Well, being unable to compile mpg123 under x86_64 i installed lame and
transformed the mp3-->wav-->raw.
and using "files" as the format player.
Are there any good scripts to stress test MoH?
I want to test this machine for 1000 "calls" on hold.
http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/astertest.htm
I can't imagine why Gnu's assembler compiler wouldn't work for i586
instructions, but does mpg123 perhaps need NASM instead?
No guarantees, but I was toying with installing a CentOS 4.3 box today
anyway, maybe I'll see if I can get it to compile for me and let you
know if and how. I don't
If someone here happens to have a mpg123 binary compiled for Centos 43
in a Pentium Dual Core, let me know.
Somehow mpg123 cant compile.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mpg123-0.59r]# make linux
make CC=gcc LDFLAGS= \
OBJECTS='decode_i386.o dct64_i386.o decode_i586.o \
audio_oss.o term.o'
Please let us know your results. I cannot really test this in
production system since it is a $16,000/hr call center. I was using
madplay but it was crashing and creating zombie processes, I figured
native was not the way to go since all of the different audio streams.
Mpg123 works perfectly
Interesting.
So, i will have to test then...
On 5/27/06, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my very limited testing of native, each channel was receiving a
different stream (each caller heard something different). Under a high
volume of calls, which is going to hurt performance more?
In my very limited testing of native, each channel was receiving a
different stream (each caller heard something different). Under a high
volume of calls, which is going to hurt performance more? Transcoding
MP3s but sending a single stream or separate streams per call under
native?
When I
Thanks to all. Native format will be.
On 5/27/06, Matt Riddell (IT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
> Erick Perez wrote:
>> should I use mpg123 with asterisk 1.2.7 or should i use the native
>> player asterisk has?
>> the target machine will receive heavy load.
>
> mpg123 was u
Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
> Erick Perez wrote:
>> should I use mpg123 with asterisk 1.2.7 or should i use the native
>> player asterisk has?
>> the target machine will receive heavy load.
>
> mpg123 was used back when asterisk didn't have native format support. If
> you are expecting heavy load, the
Erick Perez wrote:
> should I use mpg123 with asterisk 1.2.7 or should i use the native
> player asterisk has?
> the target machine will receive heavy load.
If the machine will have heavy load then using mp3 files would not be
advised, no matter how you play them. I would recommend using native
f
Erick Perez wrote:
should I use mpg123 with asterisk 1.2.7 or should i use the native
player asterisk has?
the target machine will receive heavy load.
mpg123 was used back when asterisk didn't have native format support. If
you are expecting heavy load, the native format is the way to go. You
should I use mpg123 with asterisk 1.2.7 or should i use the native
player asterisk has?
the target machine will receive heavy load.
also, has anyone succedded in compiling mpg123 in a dual core pentium
with centos 4.3 ?
--
---
Erick Perez
Linux User 37658
Chris Stenton wrote:
I've had issues with Native MOH when using IAX trunking and Placing a
caller into a parking slot. Sound is awful. So, for parking I use
mpg123 and everything else I'm using Native MOH.
Have you placed a bug report about this?
No,
I can't always reproduce it. Seems
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Lytle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 alternative?
Matt Roth wrote:
We were using t
Just to through another hat in the ring... I use madplay for mp3s...
[default]
mode=custom
directory=/var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3
application=/usr/bin/madplay -Q -o raw:- --mono -R 8000 -a -12
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 15:23 -0600, Aaron Daniel wrote:
> I'd suggest using the format_mp3 program that's in
: Re: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 alternative?
Ah! Now this is actually something I've not been able to get my head
around:
> Note: As of Asterisk 1.2.0, Mpg123 is no longer used by Asterisk,
which > has its own MP3 player.
Can anybody tell me where this built-in MP3 player is in 1.2.x/
> > Is there any particular reason for the native file format stuff to be in
> > asterisk-addons as opposed to that code being merged into trunk?
>
> It isn't. You are mis-interpreting the information in this thread (it's
> been unclearly stated anyway).
>
> The only portion that is in asterisk-a
-Users] mpg123 alternative?
Ah! Now this is actually something I've not been able to get my head
around:
> Note: As of Asterisk 1.2.0, Mpg123 is no longer used by Asterisk,
which > has its own MP3 player.
Can anybody tell me where this built-in MP3 player is in 1.2.x/how do I
use it
We switched to that after mpg123 wouldn't compile on our newer 64bit
machines
You might have successfully compiled with "make linux-devel" perhaps. I did.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUB
Rich Adamson wrote:
> Is there any particular reason for the native file format stuff to be in
> asterisk-addons as opposed to that code being merged into trunk?
It isn't. You are mis-interpreting the information in this thread (it's
been unclearly stated anyway).
The only portion that is in ast
Thanks for the info Matt.
I had the zombie issue too. Based on my observations I decided those
processes were due to safe_asterisk not killing rawplayer (it does mpg123
processes). So I modified safe_asterisk to do that, and zombie processes
were gone.
But you may be right, native players ma
is Raouf
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2006 5:36 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 alternative?
Ah! Now this is actually something I've not been able to get my head around:
> Note: As of Asterisk 1.2.0, Mpg123 is no longer us
Matt Roth wrote:
We were using the rawplayer method on our server, but it ended up
spawning hundreds of zombie processes. I talked to Kevin Fleming
about it, and he recommended switching to native MOH. Scalability is
a big concern of mine, so I asked him about the
I've had issues with
I'd suggest using the format_mp3 program that's included in
asterisk-addons. We switched to that after mpg123 wouldn't compile on
our newer 64bit machines, and it works like a charm, and you don't have
to change anything.
Aaron
Rich Adamson wrote:
Been using mpg123 for moh for the last two
> Ah! Now this is actually something I've not been able to get my head around:
>
> > Note: As of Asterisk 1.2.0, Mpg123 is no longer used by Asterisk, which
> > has its own MP3 player.
>
> Can anybody tell me where this built-in MP3 player is in 1.2.x/how do I
> use it ?
>
> I still seem to h
Hi,
I still seem to have the usual two mpg123 processes running with
1.2.4, with whatever music on hold is set in musiconhold.conf
I'm sure it is very obvious, but I can't for the life of me figure out
what I'm supposed to do to use the built-in MP3 player facilities.
[default]
mode=mp3
dir
Soner Tari wrote:
I vote for the raw file format, due to the reasons listed here:
http://www.orderlyq.com/asteriskqueues.html
Of course you need to convert all mp3 moh files to raw format
manually, but it's easy as described there.
We were using the rawplayer method on our server, but it end
Ah! Now this is actually something I've not been able to get my head around:
> Note: As of Asterisk 1.2.0, Mpg123 is no longer used by Asterisk, which
> has its own MP3 player.
Can anybody tell me where this built-in MP3 player is in 1.2.x/how do I
use it ?
I still seem to have the usual two
> On 02/23/06 21:15 Rich Adamson said the following:
> > I see references in musiconhold.conf relative to madplay, native file
> > format, asterisk-addons, etc. Not sure why the asterisk-addon approach
> > hasn't been moved into trunk, or if madplay is a better choice on this
>
> i think it would
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 alternative?
On 02/23/06 21:15 Rich Adamson said the following:
I see references in musiconhold.conf relative to madplay, nati
On 02/23/06 21:15 Rich Adamson said the following:
I see references in musiconhold.conf relative to madplay, native file
format, asterisk-addons, etc. Not sure why the asterisk-addon approach
hasn't been moved into trunk, or if madplay is a better choice on this
i think it would be better off
ve many callers, like in my
environment, to play the MOH to.
Lee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolás Gudiño
Sent: 23 February 2006 13:38
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 a
Hi Rich,
> Been using mpg123 for moh for the last two years or so. However, when
> I have * config errors, often times get a endless stream of console
> messages and need to kill the two mpg123 processes.
>
> Is there an alternative to mpg123 that eliminates that issue?
>
> I see references in mus
Been using mpg123 for moh for the last two years or so. However, when
I have * config errors, often times get a endless stream of console
messages and need to kill the two mpg123 processes.
Is there an alternative to mpg123 that eliminates that issue?
I see references in musiconhold.conf relativ
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:16:51PM +0100, Matt Riddell (IT) wrote:
> I tried to get my wife to killall mpg123 processes from the console, but
> the machine was probably in the Asterisk console rather than the command
> line.
!killall mpg123
should work from the asterisk CLI
--
Tzafrir Cohe
Robert La Ferla wrote:
How can you convert mp3 to gsm? mencoder? Do you have an example?
Once again, documented on the wiki :-)
sox is your friend; it can convert between pretty much all available
codecs, except G.729 and G.723.1.
___
--Bandwidt
Kevin Bockman wrote:
If you are using 1.2, I would use native (codec, not MP3). There
should be an example in the sample config file in
/usr/src/asterisk/configs/musiconhold.conf.sample - I don't see it on
the Wiki. It should be there, somewhere. Must be buried. For this
option, you will n
we had the same problem, so we switched it to madplay (do a search in
the wiki)
and that issue stopped.
Best Regards
Greg Cirino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Virus & Spam Free
and you can't do better than that!
http://www.cirellemail.com
Cirelle Enterprises Inc.
25 Indian Rock Rd #421
Windham NH, 030
Robert La Ferla wrote:
Chris Albertson wrote:
Second even if there were one the mpg123 process is not long lived. A
new one is started for each
MOH session.
I hate to say it but there is a problem where the mpg123 process never
terminates. This occurs with the latest SVN-branch-1.2-r79
Kevin Bockman wrote:
If you are using 1.2, I would use native (codec, not MP3). There
should be an example in the sample config file in
/usr/src/asterisk/configs/musiconhold.conf.sample - I don't see it on
the Wiki. It should be there, somewhere. Must be buried. For this
option, you wil
>
> Almost certainly a memory leak in mpg123 is not the cause of a system
> crash. First off, there is no such leak. Second even if there were
> one the mpg123 process is not long lived. A new one is started for
> each MOH session.
>
> If mpg123 is causing the crash then it may be due simply b
That's been happenning since < 1.2 - if the parent * process dies the
mp123 process doesn't go with it like it should and will just eat your
processor right up, if you're using 1.2, I'd definitely suggest using
native moh.
Robert La Ferla wrote:
Chris Albertson wrote:
Second even if there w
Chris Albertson wrote:
Second even if there were one the mpg123 process is not long lived. A new one
is started for each
MOH session.
I hate to say it but there is a problem where the mpg123 process never
terminates. This occurs with the latest SVN-branch-1.2-r7917 version
and has been do
Almost certainly a memory leak in mpg123 is not the cause of a system
crash. First off, there is no such leak. Second even if there were
one
the mpg123 process is not long lived. A new one is started for each
MOH session.
If mpg123 is causing the crash then it may be due simply because of
all
Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
When I configured this server, I did not do the make mpg123 option.
Months later, I read about it and did it, as the client was asking about
MOH. About a week later the server crashed, which it never has before. I
believe mpg123 have a memory leak.
What's the best wa
When I configured this server, I did not do the make mpg123 option.
Months later, I read about it and did it, as the client was asking about
MOH. About a week later the server crashed, which it never has before. I
believe mpg123 have a memory leak.
What's the best way to remove it, and is there
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 08:41 -0700, Jason Becker wrote:
Patrick wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 09:56 +1100, Brad wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>Anyone able to point me in the right direction to compile this app? It
>>is running ubuntu..
>
>
> Not really but iirc there is a Mandrake/Mandriva mpg123 SR
Patrick wrote:
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 09:56 +1100, Brad wrote:
[snip]
Anyone able to point me in the right direction to compile this app? It
is running ubuntu..
Not really but iirc there is a Mandrake/Mandriva mpg123 SRPM floating
around that had some x86_64 patches in it. Maybe you could try
I wasted a lot of time on this and never figured it out. Finally went
with Madplayer. If you find a solution, please let us know.
>
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 09:56 +1100, Brad wrote:
> [snip]
> > Anyone able to point me in the right direction to compile this app?
It
> > is running ubuntu..
>
>
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 09:56 +1100, Brad wrote:
[snip]
> Anyone able to point me in the right direction to compile this app? It
> is running ubuntu..
Not really but iirc there is a Mandrake/Mandriva mpg123 SRPM floating
around that had some x86_64 patches in it. Maybe you could try to track
the SR
>
> I am trying to install AMP for Asterisk, which requires mpg123.
> Apparently, they say, mpg321 does not work with their setup.
I would think that you could just edit musiconhold.conf after AMP is
installed, and have it use something else like madplay. Madplay has
worked very well for me so fa
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 09:56:45AM +1100, Brad wrote:
Anyone able to point me in the right direction to compile this app? It
is running ubuntu..
Don't bother. Unless you want to stream music, there are cheaper
alteratives to mpg123. Not to mention that mpg123 0.59r has
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 09:56:45AM +1100, Brad wrote:
> Anyone able to point me in the right direction to compile this app? It
> is running ubuntu..
Don't bother. Unless you want to stream music, there are cheaper
alteratives to mpg123. Not to mention that mpg123 0.59r has some known
holes (as m
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 on x86_64 (Opteron MP)
> > Joseph wrote:
> >> Why do you need to compile it?
> >> Isn't it available as an rpm package?
> >>
> > I will assume he knows why he needs to compile it.
> >
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 07:32:31AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 07:37:41PM -0400, Steve Gladden wrote:
>
> > The debian package installs something else called "mpg321" and creates
> > an alias or symlink called mpg123 to mpg321.
>
> Get the package mpg123 from non-free
T
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 07:37:41PM -0400, Steve Gladden wrote:
> The debian package installs something else called "mpg321" and creates
> an alias or symlink called mpg123 to mpg321.
Get the package mpg123 from non-free
--
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il
This was just a recent personal experience
Maybe I missed a thread on this:
We recently installed asterisk (CVS-HEAD) on a debian system using 2.6
kernel and the enhanced RTC for all timing.
Also a custom compiled kernel for the CPU on the box (P4).
We had a strange thing happen in that with
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 on x86_64 (Opteron MP)
Joseph wrote:
Why do you need to compile it?
Isn't it available as an rpm package?
I will assume he knows why he needs to compile it.
See if the source for the rpm, deb, or whatever from the distro you
are
running will buil
Joseph wrote:
Why do you need to compile it?
Isn't it available as an rpm package?
I will assume he knows why he needs to compile it.
See if the source for the rpm, deb, or whatever from the distro you are
running will build for you. That will often get your system to the point
where any
Why do you need to compile it?
Isn't it available as an rpm package?
--
#Joseph
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 08:56 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has anyone successfully compiled mpg123 in the 1.0.x or 1.2beta1
> distributions (I'm running FC3 linux on an Opteron 2 processor
> system)? Are ther
Has anyone successfully compiled mpg123 in the 1.0.x or 1.2beta1
distributions (I'm running FC3 linux on an Opteron 2 processor
system)? Are there any patches out there to make it work?
gcc -DI386_ASSEM -DPENTIUM_OPT -DREAL_IS_FLOAT -DLINUX -
DREAD_MMAP -DOSS -DTERM_CONTROL
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] mpg123 - two processes
Yes, I always have two.
MARK.
Billy Dunn wrote:
> Does everyone have two processes running for mpg123? I always have
> them when I'm running an idle Asterisk box. No calls going in or out
> a
Ronald_Wiplinger wrote:
Brian West wrote:
If you use mp3nb from the sample configs you will have exactly 1 per
class.
Great!
Where can I read more details about it?
(musiconhold.conf)
in musiconhold.conf:
[classes]
default => mp3nb:/var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3
Flynn
Brian West wrote:
If you use mp3nb from the sample configs you will have exactly 1 per
class.
Great!
Where can I read more details about it?
(musiconhold.conf)
bye
Ronald
/b
On Jul 26, 2005, at 9:38 PM, MF Hulber wrote:
Yes, I always have two.
MARK.
Billy Dunn wrote:
Does everyo
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
