Re: [asterisk-users] pci cards VS patton

2009/3/2 Darrick Hartman > >> On another topic, I would say those gateway are not so easy to configure > : > >> - a web server is embeded but it is not documented anywhere and it's > >> GUI is far from natural, > >> - alternatively, you can edit a config file for which a huge doc is > >> availabl

Re: [asterisk-users] pci cards VS patton

2009/3/2 Giorgio Incantalupo > Hi Olivier, > > so if you say that Patton hardware is bad documented, hard to configured > and without echo canceller I think it is useless...don't you think? I won't say so. Would you say Bristuff is well documented ? What I meant is I rated it hard to configur

Re: [asterisk-users] pci cards VS patton

>> On another topic, I would say those gateway are not so easy to configure : >> - a web server is embeded but it is not documented anywhere and it's >> GUI is far from natural, >> - alternatively, you can edit a config file for which a huge doc is >> available but, as this boxes are not specific

Re: [asterisk-users] pci cards VS patton

Hi Olivier, so if you say that Patton hardware is bad documented, hard to configured and without echo canceller I think it is useless...don't you think? Unless it is much more reliable (no crashes at all) Olivier wrote: > > > 2009/3/2 Giorgio Incantalupo

Re: [asterisk-users] pci cards VS patton

2009/3/2 Giorgio Incantalupo > Hi all, > > I've been using telephone cards for 4-5 years and now I'm considering > the Patton gateways. What are the pro and cons of Patton stuff compared > to internal cards in a production system? Someone say external gateway > are better because has no echo but

[asterisk-users] pci cards VS patton

Hi all, I've been using telephone cards for 4-5 years and now I'm considering the Patton gateways. What are the pro and cons of Patton stuff compared to internal cards in a production system? Someone say external gateway are better because has no echo but have a longer delay when placing calls.