Re: [asterisk-users] spandsp 0.0. 3 RxFax fax =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_reception c rashes bristuffed_asterisk_1=2E2=2E13_[?= Virusgeprüft]

2006-12-20 Thread Lee Howard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sure in an small office you can use iaxmodem/hylafax to receive faxes - we use it for sending faxes, but would you try to set up about 100 iaxmodems inside hylafax if you can handle it directly inside asterisk with rx_fax and a small script ? Yes, I would, actually

Re: [asterisk-users] spandsp 0.0. 3 RxFax fax =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_reception c rashes bristuffed_asterisk_1=2E2=2E13_[?= Virusgeprüft]

2006-12-20 Thread Lee Howard
Colin Anderson wrote: AFAIC, Hylafax + IAXmodem is the way to go for anything serious, unless we are talking about thousands of users and thousands of faxes per day. I don't even know what could be scaled to that scenario and not be unmanageable. For the thousands and thousands scenario you

Re: [asterisk-users] spandsp 0.0. 3 RxFax fax =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_reception c rashes bristuffed_asterisk_1=2E2=2E13_[?= Virusgeprüft]

2006-12-20 Thread Lee Howard
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: I don't see why rxfax would be less reliable than iaxmodem/hylafax as it's using the same spandsp to receive fax. spandsp is a dsp library with lots of pieces to it. IAXmodem uses the T.31 portion (the Class 1 modem) which uses the actual DSP parts of V.21, V.29,

Re: [asterisk-users] spandsp 0.0. 3 RxFax fax =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_reception c rashes bristuffed_asterisk_1=2E2=2E13_[?= Virusgeprüft]

2006-12-20 Thread Lee Howard
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: What are the advantages of T31 over T30 ? T.30 is the spec for fax protocol. T.31 is the spec for a Class 1 fax modem. So T.31 is a layer that allows something else to perform fax protocol (T.30) through it. There may be some intrinsic value to handling faxing