Ok,
Im not a developper but what do you think of both a
wish list .
Harry
> To answer your question: there is no roadmap for
> 1.4. We just began the
> 'scheduled release' cycle with this release, and we
> are still trying to
> feel our way into the process and learn how much
> work we can acc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where can we find a roadmap of asterisk 1.4 release ?
Harry... please use proper mailing list etiquette when posting to these
lists. It is very tiresome to see you quote an entire long message,
without changing the subject, and insert a one-line unrelated comment at
the
Hi all,
Where can we find a roadmap of asterisk 1.4 release ?
Harry
--- Olle E Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Welcome to the Asterisk users community!
>
>
> Asterisk is the leading Open Source Telephony
> platform,
> with support both for clas
Jay Milk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are we on this again? How about letting the list-owner(s) decide what's
> appropriate here, rather than wasting bandwidth discussing what you guys
> think is proper list-etiquette. Some people differ from your opinions
> and their reasons are just as valid as y
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 10:52:11AM -0500, Jay Milk said:
> Are we on this again? How about letting the list-owner(s) decide what's
> appropriate here, rather than wasting bandwidth discussing what you guys
> think is proper list-etiquette. Some people differ from your opinions
> and their reasons
rved slaps" and telling others what not to
do. The noive.
> -Original Message-
> From: Walt Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ASTERISK
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 02:09:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Walt Reed wrote:
>
> > Agree 1000%. Any attachments other than PGP / SMIME signatures should be
> > rejected or stripped. If people want to post stuff, use
Walt Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:28:50AM +0900, Sunrise Ltd said:
>
> > There is also some stuff that could be done automatically
> > to keep the noise level down. For example ...
> >
> > - any post to the list with the digest in the subject line
> > or the digest i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Walt Reed wrote:
> Agree 1000%. Any attachments other than PGP / SMIME signatures should be
> rejected or stripped. If people want to post stuff, use a web or FTP
> site and post a pointer.
Sounds good to me, except - what about
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:28:50AM +0900, Sunrise Ltd said:
> There is also some stuff that could be done automatically
> to keep the noise level down. For example ...
>
> - any post to the list with the digest in the subject line
> or the digest in the body, should be auto-rejected.
>
> - any p
James H. Thompson wrote:
(B
(B>I've wondered if a mechanism like this would help:
(B>For the first N messages you post to the mailing list,
(B>your post does not automatically get posted.
(B>Instead you get a message similar to Olle's below,
(B>ending with something like:
(B>
(B> "If yo
I am on many mailing lists and lots of them have similar problems with people posting
messages they
could better answer themselves.
Since many of these messages are from people posting for the first time,
I think to some degree this is a failing of the mailing list structure itself.
I've wondered
12 matches
Mail list logo