On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Sven Fischer (support) wrote:
The XML minibrowser is available in a special image only.
http://www.snom.com/minibrowser/firmware/
In future images it will be in by default.
Is the xml minibrowser firmware equivalent to 5.0+xml, 5.2+xml? It's not
obvious.
Also, might want
I have this new toy to play with, correct?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Fischer (support) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 5:27 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Announcement: Sno
rcial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Announcement: Snom 360 with integrated XML
O bjects
Hi.
Use massdeployment for putting the licenses on to your phones.
There is a setting called "license_url" you can use like the firmware update
URL, the macro {mac} will be replaced by the MAC
Hi.
Use massdeployment for putting the licenses on to your phones.
There is a setting called "license_url" you can use like the firmware update
URL, the macro {mac} will be replaced by the MAC address of the phone. So if
you provide the setting like this:
license_url: http://yourwebserver/{mac
Is there any plans for a site license or some way to deploy the license a
little more elegantly? I have a lot of 360's!
I'm excited about this feature - it enables me to deploy some solutions that
I have been promising to my endusers. The two I have in mind are Outlook
calendar push to the display
that is *very* cool. However, I am somewhat concerned about being forced to
license the firmware (even if it is free) can you comment for the list the
rationale behind forcing a license and how this might affect Snom users who,
say, want to DOWN grade their firmware?
ps is there a timetable for su
