On 04/12/06, Arun Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI,
My Asterisk is registed with my SER. My client are connected to asterisk
when they dial any no like 6 asterisk passes this is ser and then again
ser passes this no (strip 1) back to my asterisk. but insted of ringing
this exten it
What is the purpose of that sort of call routing, it does seem like a loop
to me. Asterisk is probably getting re-invited to itself...
On 12/4/06, Arun Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI,
My Asterisk is registed with my SER. My client are connected to asterisk
when they dial any no like 6
Have a look at the OpenSER and Asterisk part of
http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php
and
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Realtime+Integration+Of+Asterisk+With+OpenSER
Arun Kumar wrote:
HI,
I'm not able to find some good doc or manual regarding Integration of
Asterisk with SER.
On Tue June 20 2006 08:23, Daniel Salama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been reading about integrating Asterisk with SER to help
Asterisk deal with large volume of registrations (mainly). I was
planning on fronting Asterisk with SER for that purpose. Not that I
have the traffic at this
hi,
SER is less about the number of callers than it is about the number of registered sip clients. Without NAT issues a pizza box server with SER can essentially register an unlimited number of SIP clients.
With larger numbers of SIP clients i find SER handles them much better than asterisk.
Now,
It's very doable.
I did a presentation of a case study on this exact solution at
Astricon last month.
Contact me off list for the slides.
On 11/3/05, Waldo Rubinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose the * and SER topic has been discussed way too much, but I
searching through all the
Yes it works and as you said all you need to change is the listening
port for one of both.
Zoa.
Keith O'Brien wrote:
Does anyone know if it is possible to run both Asterisk and SER on the
same box?I am looking to use SER as the SIP proxy while sending
SIP calls to a local Asterisk process
Hello Deepak,
1. don't post multiple times. it's annoying. enough said.
2. run asterisk in verbose mode (start it with asterisk -vgc),
place a call from a SIP endpoint behind SER to the asterisk server,
and see what happens in the asterisk CLI.
3. if you don't see anything there, get ngrep
SER is a SIP proxy, Asterisk is a PBX, and application server.
SER passes calls from place to place and does not get in the audio path.
SER uses SIP, * is able to transcode, and convert Protocols.
You can build an IVR, VM, and PBX with Asterisk. SER is like a traffic
cop, where * is the car
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:44:30 -0500, Paul Rodan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know FWD uses a SER/Asterisk combo, and I keep hearing about the massive
benefits, however, my initial playing around in SER's configuration
indicates it's NOTHING like Asterisk at all, and almost 5x as difficult to
Hi
SER is a proxy, asterisk handles the media part much better, if you add
them together you get a front end proxy which can carry out all your
routing functions and then pass to ur media servers at the back.
Asterisk can also terminate the calls to pstn , with ser you will need
additional
--- Kurtz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it that the wiki indirectly recommends SER (or another proxy) out in front of
Asterisk.
If Asterisk can use radius, and provide the rest of AAA they why ? Incidentall\y,
I'm not
familiar with network configuration really, although I do
.
Umar.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aaron J.
Angel
Sent: 15 June 2004 20:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK V. SER
Usedcanon wrote:
Just out of interest (as I am a freeBSD fan) why more stable on BSD ?
I
Usedcanon wrote:
Just out of interest (as I am a freeBSD fan) why more stable on BSD ?
I have no idea, it just seems to run better on *BSD. I'm still trying to
investigate that myself. Perhaps I'm just inept when it comes to Linux, but
it has never run decently for me -- I've always had
/
- Original Message -
From: Aaron J. Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK V. SER
Usedcanon wrote:
Just out of interest (as I am a freeBSD fan) why more stable on BSD ?
I have no idea, it just seems
Hello,
I can tell you what asterisk is but as for SER... well, I've never dealt
with it. Asterisk is a linux pbx solution combining multiple protocols (IAX,
H323, SIP, Skinny, MGCP, SCCP) so that they can each talk to eachother and
multiple codecs (one can use G729 and the other can use ULAW for
Joshua Colp wrote:
I can tell you what asterisk is but as for SER... well, I've
never dealt with it. Asterisk is a linux pbx solution
Linux PBX solution is such a narrow point of view. Asterisk also runs on
*BSD; yes, conferencing and MP3s are a bit sketchy due to lack of timer (for
now),
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:24 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK V. SER
Joshua Colp wrote:
I can tell you what asterisk is but as for SER... well, I've
never dealt with it. Asterisk is a linux pbx solution
Linux PBX solution is such a narrow point
Just out of interest (as I am a freeBSD fan) why more stable on BSD ?
Umar.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aaron J.
Angel
Sent: 14 June 2004 15:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK V. SER
Joshua Colp wrote:
I
Hi
Shad,
1. You
configure that in extensions.conf
exten
= _[prefix to forward to SER].,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED] SER
IP],10)
and
register your Asterisk to SER in sip.conf
register = asterisk:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SER
IP]/asterisk
2. you
can do that in extensions.conf for example
exten
listas iPfone wrote:
Hi All
I´m trying to use asterisk and ser in the same box.
When i start ser my phones don´t connect with asterisk anymore.
i have two nics in this machine 192.168.0.31/37
I need to set asterisk and ser to listen in diferente adresses or ports?
I can use the two softwares
21 matches
Mail list logo
