Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Scalability
We have multiple installs that tested-out at nearly concurrent 400 SIP
channels on a Dell 2950 with 2Xquad core at 1.6 Ghz, 16 GB of RAM.
Bryan M. Johns
Shelton | Johns
Office: 678.248.2637
FindMe
We have multiple installs that tested-out at nearly concurrent 400 SIP
channels on a Dell 2950 with 2Xquad core at 1.6 Ghz, 16 GB of RAM.
Bryan M. Johns
Shelton | Johns
Office: 678.248.2637
FindMe: 678.229.1809
Support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sheltonjohns.com
On Feb 8, 2008, at 5:09 AM, F
Thanks!
Femi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philipp von
Klitzing
Sent: 08 February 2008 15:20
To: asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Scalability
Hi!
> Does anyone have data
Hi!
> Does anyone have data on the switching capacity of Asterisk based on the
> hardware?
> I need to know what type of hardware would be required to switch 100
> simultaneous calls as opposed to 1000 or 1 calls, no TDM just SIP to SIP
> VoIP calls
Use the Wiki, Luke!
http://www.voip-info.or
n VoIP phones and
>gateways so we can assume that there is no transcoding
>
>Femi
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philipp
>Kempgen
>Sent: 08 February 2008 12:15
>To: Asterisk Users
>Subject: Re: [a
: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Scalability
Femi wrote:
> Does anyone have data on the switching capacity of Asterisk based on the
> hardware?
> I need to know what type of hardware would be required to switch 100
> simultaneous calls as opposed to 1000 or 1 calls, no TDM just SIP t
Femi wrote:
> Does anyone have data on the switching capacity of Asterisk based on the
> hardware?
> I need to know what type of hardware would be required to switch 100
> simultaneous calls as opposed to 1000 or 1 calls, no TDM just SIP to SIP
> VoIP calls
That largely depends on whether you
>
> > >
> > > __
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen
> > > Davies
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2008 7:57 AM
> &
Hello,
On Jan/24/2008, Paul Hales wrote:
>
> http://www.transnexus.com/White%
> 20Papers/asterisk_V1-4-11_performance.htm
>
> It was the bottom news item on voip-info.org - I was worried I would
> have to really search for it!
and I guess that transcoding benchmark could increase to non-transc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen> >
> Davies> > Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2008 7:57 AM> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> Asterisk Users Mailing List -> > Non-Commercial Discussion> > Subject: Re:
> [asterisk-users] Asterisk s
get an idea of what different
> > > hardware can achieve.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
rdware can achieve.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen
> > Davies
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2008 7:57 AM
>
half Of Stephen
> Davies
> Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2008 7:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
> Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk scalability
>
>
>
>
> I'm sure that an Asterisk developer can
: Thursday, 24 January 2008 7:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk scalability
I'm sure that an Asterisk developer can chime in and give several examples
of how Asterisk uses its threads to increase scalab
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:03 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Stephen Davies wrote:
>
> > By the way, I have a client with a four-core Xeon box doing SIP to IAX
> > conversion - that box can handle 1000 concurrent calls.
>
>With media passing through it?
if doing conver
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Stephen Davies wrote:
> By the way, I have a client with a four-core Xeon box doing SIP to IAX
> conversion - that box can handle 1000 concurrent calls.
With media passing through it?
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-9
> I'm sure that an Asterisk developer can chime in and give several examples
> of how Asterisk uses its threads to increase scalability. That said, there
> will be a point where the number of core/CPU's won't be the bottleneck so
> adding more won't help anything.
>
Asterisk is highly multi-threa
Hello,
On Jan/23/2008, Ryan Burke wrote:
> > I wonder how Asterisk scales when we increment the Core's or CPU's of
> > one computer.
> > I see that Asterisk is only one process (I guess that it uses threads).
> Asterisk is one process, but as you mentioned multi-threaded as well.
> Because it
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder how Asterisk scales when we increment the Core's or CPU's of
> one computer.
>
> I see that Asterisk is only one process (I guess that it uses threads).
> But because Asterisk is only one process, this process is always
> executed in the same CPU. So we can have a 8 Cores se
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
hello there,
any one who used ASTCC in a real enviroment, or has successfully
handled above 1k simultanous calls. need some evalution of ASTCC. if
any one has such an experience please share it with the rest
To handle > 1k concurrent calls, you might perhaps need somet
I don't know how relevant this info is to * doing iax<->sip, but on
the ser lists they posted these results for mediaproxy (written in
python) and rtpproxy (written in C):
> In our tests, on a 1GHz Athlon CPU running linux 2.4.26 we got
> the following results:
> mediaproxy reaches 95% CPU load
t 01, 2004 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk scalability?
Hi, Scott
Thanks for your information. I have worse luck in load testing with
asterisk.
I have tried both SIP and H323 inbound calls and terminating on PSTN PRIs. I
am using a single Xeon 2.8G chip and
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Stingel
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk scalability?
Hi Roy-
I've done a lot of load testing with asterisk and TE410P's.
My guess, with no trans
Hi Roy-
I've done a lot of load testing with asterisk and TE410P's.
My guess, with no transcoding, is that you might be able to handle 8
E1's
max on the PSTN side absolute max (ie: 2 TE410P's). This assumes you
have a
fast processor.If you're using T1's, scale these numbers up
accordingly,
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Hi
I plan to setup an asterisk box to function as a SIP gateway
forwarding lots of calls to/from a backend of several other asterisk
boxes, each with a TE410 card for PSTN connectivity. It will only
gateway the calls into the PSTN gateways. No transcoding is planned
Hi Roy-
I've done a lot of load testing with asterisk and TE410P's.
My guess, with no transcoding, is that you might be able to handle 8 E1's
max on the PSTN side absolute max (ie: 2 TE410P's). This assumes you have a
fast processor.If you're using T1's, scale these numbers up accordingly,
as
26 matches
Mail list logo
