Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-25 Thread Leif Madsen
On 6/15/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade product, but it's becoming apparent

Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-25 Thread Steve Totaro
Leif Madsen wrote: On 6/15/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade product, but it's

Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-25 Thread Patrick
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 05:20 -0400, Leif Madsen wrote: On 6/15/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for

Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-25 Thread Martin Joseph
On Jun 25, 2006, at 3:29 AM, Patrick wrote: On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 05:20 -0400, Leif Madsen wrote: On 6/15/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Watkins, Bradley
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Garstang Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:50 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations -Original Message

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 9:54 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 9:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Stephen Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:41 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations On 15/06/06, Douglas Garstang

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Aaron Daniel
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: We need our queue application to follow the primary pbx server for a set of phones within a company. See my 'ACD Distributed Scenario' post made a little earlier for a full explanation. OK, let me get this straight. You want the phones on the

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Douglas Garstang Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:51 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations -Original Message- From: Stephen Davies