On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, A J Stiles wrote:
Can you use variables in the target of a GoTo() statement?
Yes. Here are a few examples from one of my dialplans:
; invalid template
[i](!)
exten = i,1,verbose(1,[${EXTEN}@${CONTEXT}])
exten = i,n,
A J Stiles wrote:
I can't seem to find a definitive answer on this, and I really don't want to
risk breaking a production server to find out; so I am going to try asking this
here, and maybe anyone else in the same situation searching the archives
sometime in future will find the answer I get.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:00 AM, unsero...@aol.com wrote:
But how can i determine on which physical server user B is registered?
Or is there an other, better way to achieve this? Maybe in replicating the
registrations between all 3 servers?
DUNDi is an options, same with DNS SRV records.
--
But how can i determine on which physical server user B is registered?
Or is there an other, better way to achieve this? Maybe in replicating the
registrations between all 3 servers?
DUNDi is an options, same with DNS SRV records.
--
Could you please give me some more info?
Or is
as a quick option you can use
Dial(IAX2/server1/${EXTEN}IAX2/server2/${EXTEN}IAX2/server3/${EXTEN})
call will connect to whichever is available answer, others simply ignored!
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:09 PM, unsero...@aol.com wrote:
But how can i determine on which physical server user B
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:09 PM, unsero...@aol.com wrote:
But how can i determine on which physical server user B is registered?
Or is there an other, better way to achieve this? Maybe in replicating the
registrations between all 3 servers?
DUNDi is an options, same
Hello.
Look, in Your sip.conf
[601]
deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 - you deny all, but some lines down you allow
from all
context=office
type=friend
secret=601
qualify=yes
;port=5060
permit=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
nat=no
mailbox=...@device
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=rfc2833
dial=SIP/601
In your sip.conf your permit line does not have an ip address to allow the
register from so the call is coming in as a guest and that is likely using
context default.
Set the permit line to either the ip address of the phone or the network the
phone is on.
permit=192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
В Втр, 27/04/2010 в 06:11 -0700, Jim Dickenson пишет:
In your sip.conf your permit line does not have an ip address to allow the
register from so the call is coming in as a guest and that is likely using
context default.
Set the permit line to either the ip address of the phone or the
I am not sure what you are asking here.
--
Jim Dickenson
mailto:dicken...@cfmc.com
CfMC
http://www.cfmc.com/
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:16 AM, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
В Втр, 27/04/2010 в 06:11 -0700, Jim Dickenson пишет:
In your sip.conf your permit line does not have an ip address to allow
Matthew Simpson wrote:
Hello, I have a dial plan that tries to place a call over several
different outbound gateways, like this:
exten = _1X.,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _1X.,2,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _1X.,3,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _1X.,4,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL
Matthew Simpson wrote:
What is the best way to handle this? Inserting +101 extensions with the
Hangup command ? Will that still properly signal 486 busy here back?
Should I be using Congestion instead of Hang up ?
What's the best way to handle it? Use my patch (unpublished) that stops
Dial()
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Justin Richards wrote:
I currently have a dialplan set up to let me dial a specific
extension, authenticate the user, then have * dial a hard
coded/programmed overseas number. What I would like to do is set up
my dialplan to have an extension that offers up an outbound
Nice! that is exactly what I want!! much cleaner than the
callthrough plan (that I found two minutes after i posted my question)
I was trying to use that is posted on voip-info.org
Thanks!!
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:24:36 +0100 (CET), Peter Svensson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005,
-Original Message-
From: Danny Zak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 5:29 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Dialplan question
Hello Asterisk,
is it possible to make an extensions that
I forgot to add a link to the system command:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+System
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jackson
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 5:57 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dialplan
Can anyone shed some light on this ??? Or is this not the right sort
of question to ask?
It simply doesn't work with the current software. You need to code this at
the C source level.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone shed some light on this ??? Or is this not the right sort
of question to ask?
It simply doesn't work with the current software. You need to code this at
the C source level.
/me daydreams about being able to fork in the dialplan.
Actually you sort of can - wonder what
Hi,
-Original Message-
/me daydreams about being able to fork in the dialplan.
Actually you sort of can - wonder what something like:
Dial(Zap/1LOCAL/[EMAIL PROTECTED]LOCAL/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
would do?
That works. I use it on a daily basis. Does not make your CDR any more
Can anyone shed some light on this ??? Or is this not the right sort of
question to ask?
Simon Brown
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Brown
Sent: Wednesday, 4 August 2004 11:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Title: Message
Fredrik,
Your
dialplan looks correct, however you disallow 112, the emergency
number!
Does
it fail for local or interlocal calls?
I
use:
[dutchdial];;emergency (112) and other 11x
numbers;exten = _1XX,1,Dial(${ISDN}:${EXTEN})exten =
_1XX,2,Congestionexten =
21 matches
Mail list logo
