RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread Jeff R Glassman
I had to redue the zapata.conf Commented it out ans added, Also changed default Zap g0 to Zap 1 (deleted Zap g0) Where did you find [EMAIL PROTECTED] .4 all I see is 0.3 Jeff [channels] language=en ;context=inbound-analog ;context=default context=from-pstn signalling=fxs_ks usecallerid=yes

RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread Steven Frazier
It was released yesterday, I believe. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff R Glassman Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 2:25 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ

RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread Jeff R Glassman
found it thanks Was AMP updated? Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steven Frazier Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 2:32 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info?

RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread dean collins
Has meet me control also a few other features, info on sourceforge. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Augustyn Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 4:17 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread Jeff R Glassman
version 0.4 - 1/27/05 Asterisk 1.0.5 ztdummy Integrated WebMeetMe Bug fixes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Augustyn Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 4:17 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List -

RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread Jeff R Glassman
were you able to upgrade or did you have to install fresh? Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of dean collins Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 4:23 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread Robert Augustyn
thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff R Glassman Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 4:35 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? [EMAIL PROTECTED] V 0.4

RE: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread dean collins
I installed fresh. :( I'm sure there's a planned release of the instructions on how to do an upgrade rather than fresh but I didn't want to wait and I only have 3 extensions so no big deal to start from scratch. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread Bryan Mannos
I know this is stated for @ Home. Can anyone give me a compelling reason to not use this for business purposes? I know it's limited in it's interface for customization, but it is open source and is it not a terribly bad idea to do an install with a set amount of features anyway (to avoid that

Re: [Asterisk-Users] FW: FAQ missing info? Asterisk@home V 0.4

2005-01-28 Thread asterisk athome
The security on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a very low. Also it has not been tested thoroughly. There are two good reasons not to use it for business. --- Bryan Mannos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know this is stated for @ Home. Can anyone give me a compelling reason to not use this for business