).
- Gabe
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Info on
*HAandPolycomphone!!
Is it so dif
Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Info on
*HAandPolycomphone!!
> Is it so difficult to add a line in the dialplan directly under the one
> that fails to failover to?
>
> Aaron
>
> David Thomas
Is it so difficult to add a line in the dialplan directly under the one
that fails to failover to?
Aaron
David Thomas wrote:
The only thing is I want to be sure I understand the statement above because
the only time I can see Asterisk needing to do an SRV lookup is if it is
handing a call to a
> The only thing is I want to be sure I understand the statement above because
> the only time I can see Asterisk needing to do an SRV lookup is if it is
> handing a call to a carrier for termination.
Gabe, that is what I was talking about. Asterisk really needs the
ability to make use of the term
Huh? Phones do a NAPTR/SRV lookup in a specified domain to get a list of
SRV records to use. The phones don't query the DNS server every time they
make a call... they have a cache. You also run primary and a secondary (or
two primary) dns servers. It's a simple scalable solution. It's a shame
A
> "Q: What are the plans for HA?
> That's BS. Last time I checked, Asterisk's support of SRV was
> to only grab the first SRV entry. Period. If it doesn't try
> any more SRV hosts after the first fails, just exactly how is
> that redundant?
This is for the phones to fail over NOT Asterisk, remem
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 8:46 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Info on
> *HAandPolycomphone!!
>
&g
> "Q: What are the plans for HA?
> That's BS. Last time I checked, Asterisk's support of SRV was
> to only grab the first SRV entry. Period. If it doesn't try
> any more SRV hosts after the first fails, just exactly how is
> that redundant?
This is for the phones to fail over NOT Asterisk,