Daniel Salama wrote:
Dustin,
any updates on this?
Thanks,
Daniel
Hey Daniel!
Yes - just posted the link.
I appologize for the delay.
Here's the link to the forum as well, if anyone is interested. This
should compile and run on Asterisk-1.2.4 and higher.
Beautiful. Will test and give you comments.
Nice work.
- Daniel
On Jun 26, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Dustin Wildes wrote:
Daniel Salama wrote:
Dustin,
any updates on this?
Thanks,
Daniel
Hey Daniel!
Yes - just posted the link.
I appologize for the delay.
Here's the link to the forum as well,
; One Touch Record
;atxfer = *2 ; Attended Xfer
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Wildes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GXP-2000
Dustin,
any updates on this?
Thanks,
Daniel
On Jun 23, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Dustin Wildes wrote:
shadowym wrote:
That feature is called Bridged (or Shared) line appearance. That
is one of
the things Asterisk cannot do and nobody seems very interested in
making it
do that because it is
That feature is called Bridged (or Shared) line appearance. That is one of
the things Asterisk cannot do and nobody seems very interested in making it
do that because it is apparently not easy. There has been some talk about
implementing it but so far there does not seem to be any progress.
I
shadowym wrote:
That feature is called Bridged (or Shared) line appearance. That is one of
the things Asterisk cannot do and nobody seems very interested in making it
do that because it is apparently not easy. There has been some talk about
implementing it but so far there does not seem to
Here is the latest word on SLA that I could find. Looks like it is quite a
ways off but at least it is on the radar screen.
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2006-May/153385.html
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 23,
