te
Telco>Internetmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Storer,
Darren
Sent: 28 May 2004 09:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: dialogic was RE: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How
well does asteriskhandle?
Hi Steve,
SU> If you are using CTR4, then I guess they use CTR4. :
good
(working) * traces from a real EuroISDN circuit. Then the fun starts trying
to find a neat way to patch the stack...
Regards
Darren
--
Comgate
Telco>Internetmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: 28 May 2004 01:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dialogic was RE: [Asterisk-U
Telco>InternetTel: +44(0)700 COMGATE
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of tim panton
>Sent: 27 May 2004 20:59
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: dialogic was RE: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How
>well
e: dialogic was RE: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well
does asteriskhandle?
Scott Stingel wrote:
>Hi Steve-
>
>Just briefly:
>
>I was mentioning the old days to illustrate what an even low clock rate
>DSP can do. More recently (2000-2001), using D/600&
Scott Stingel wrote:
Hi Steve-
Just briefly:
I was mentioning the old days to illustrate what an even low clock rate DSP
can do. More recently (2000-2001), using D/600's we were able to drive a
large number of channels (8-12 E1's) for IVR.
Ah, the D/600 - damned big heat sink, lots of heat, and
tim panton wrote:
Steve Underwood wrote:
Jason Williams wrote:
At 09:16 27/05/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Maybe the time and effort would be better spent finding out why the
Digium card won't work on the NTL's PRI and either fixing it or
providing the information and testing facility to someone who can.
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Crick
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: dialogic was RE: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well
does asteriskhandle?
> Lets see. Early 90s would be ISA cards in an indus
hoping that a patch to the existing Q.931 stack is all that's
required but without some hard facts to go on it will be difficult to crack.
Regards
Darren
--
Comgate
Telco>Internetmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of tim panton
Sent: 27 May 2004 20:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dial
> Lets see. Early 90s would be ISA cards in an industrial
> PC chassis full of ISA slots. Heavy IVR means talking
> most of the time. 3k bytes/s per voice for the commonest
> 24K ADPCM mode most people use with Dialogic. So, 12 E1s
> is 360 channels. 3kbytes x 360 = more than the ISA bus can
> hand
Steve Underwood wrote:
Jason Williams wrote:
At 09:16 27/05/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Maybe the time and effort would be better spent finding out why the
Digium card won't work on the NTL's PRI and either fixing it or
providing the information and testing facility to someone who can.
NTL's PRI uses
f used Dialogics on hand) would be
nice.
>
>Regards
>Scott Stingel
>
>
>Scott M. Stingel
>President,
>Emerging Voice Technology, Inc.
>Palo Alto California & London England
>www.evtmedia.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAI
m
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 7:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dialogic was RE: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well
does asteriskhandle?
Scott Stingel wrote:
N
Jason Williams wrote:
At 09:16 27/05/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Maybe the time and effort would be better spent finding out why the
Digium card won't work on the NTL's PRI and either fixing it or
providing the information and testing facility to someone who can.
NTL's PRI uses ISDN 85 not q931 so a n
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dialogic was RE: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well
does asteriskhandle?
Scott Stingel wrote:
>Not to mention that the Digium T1/E1 cards are about 1/5 the cost of
>Dialogic's. That said, it should be noted that the Dialogic cards
At 09:16 27/05/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Maybe the time and effort would be better spent finding out why the
Digium card won't work on the NTL's PRI and either fixing it or
providing the information and testing facility to someone who can.
NTL's PRI uses ISDN 85 not q931 so a ne protocol stack would
Scott Stingel wrote:
Not to mention that the Digium T1/E1 cards are about 1/5 the cost of
Dialogic's. That said, it should be noted that the Dialogic cards allow
scaling to a much larger size within one chassis, thanks to heavy DSP
horsepower helping out with the low level chores.
The Dialogic
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 08:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> __
> >On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 14:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> On which subject, has anyone else
> >> got time to work with me on a chan_dialogicGC ? It looks do-able but I am
> >> ig
>>I think that by using a higher level
>>dialogic library it should be possible
>>to avoid the NDA and licence issues
>>that intel/dialogic imposed on the low level drivers.
>>Thats what we have done on the gjtapi project, but I had a major dance
getting the
>>threading right for that, hence the r
Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
__
>On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 14:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On which subject, has anyone else
>> got time to work with me on a chan_dialogicGC ? It looks do-able but I am ignorant
>> of how asterisk does threading.
>
>Do you have GPL driver
it contention problems.)
Just my 2c
Darren
--
Comgate
Telco>Internetmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of W. Kevin Hunt
Sent: 25 May 2004 23:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well does
asteriskhandle?
You are correct... No glare on a PRI
www.huntbrothers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Crick
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 7:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well does
asteriskhandle?
> You are correct... No g
> Its possible to get glare... but doesnt outbound start at
> channel 1 and inbound start at channel 24? Or something
> like that?
A lot of telcos and PBX installers configure it so that incoming calls hunt
sequentially from channel 1 upwards, and the PBX makes outgoing calls on
channel 23 (on a P
> What about the scenario where the CO switch offers you a call at the same
> time you try to set up an outbound call on the same channel?
Wouldn't BOTH requests fail then if it's a two-way negotiation?
Switch: I'd like to send a call to you on B17
CPE: I'd like to place a call on B17
Switch: NAK
Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well does
asteriskhandle?
> > You are correct... No glare on a PRI
> Are you sure?
>
> What about the scenario where the CO switch offers you a call at the same
> time you try to set up an outbound call on the same channel?
>
&g
> You are correct... No glare on a PRI
Are you sure?
What about the scenario where the CO switch offers you a call at the same
time you try to set up an outbound call on the same channel?
We dealt with this at my previous company (developing with VOS/CT-ADE and
Dialogic hardware connected to PRIs
Glare" condition - How well does
asteriskhandle?
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 13:53, Scott Stingel wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I have an upcoming application that requires use of PRI channels that
> are primarily used for high-volume incoming traffic, but that are to
> be used for outbound calling
26 matches
Mail list logo
