On 27 Jul 2005, at 09:53, James Cloos wrote:
"Rob" == Rob Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> For work environments where you only get HTTP or HTTPS access,
Rob> what is the feasibility of doing IAX over HTTP?
Tunnelling tcp/ip over http/(tls/)?tcp/ip is viable, tunnelling
rtp/udb/ip or
> "Rob" == Rob Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> For work environments where you only get HTTP or HTTPS access,
Rob> what is the feasibility of doing IAX over HTTP?
Tunnelling tcp/ip over http/(tls/)?tcp/ip is viable, tunnelling
rtp/udb/ip or iax/udp/ip over http/(tls/)?tcp/ip however wi
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:48:09PM +0200, Jerry Glomph Black wrote:
>
> [Have had good results with UDP-based secure tunnel transport of IAX
> traffic (CIPE and OpenVPN)]
Have you tried making it use port 53? Many otherwise restrictive
firewalls will obligingly let that through.
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 17:51 -0400, Julio Arruda wrote:
> OpenVPN can use TCP, and really, I would expect that many users using
> openvpn to bypass firewall rules, would be using TCP not UDP.
Yes OpenVPN _can_ be _configured_ to use TCP, just shows what a powerful
tool it really is.
--
Dave Cot
Dave Cotton wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:42 -0500, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
Eric Rees wrote:
We have been running IAX through OpenVPN with SSL for 6 months without
any trouble to Las Veags, and we are in Oklahoma. Most of the time, IAX
sounds better then the land line.
Using U
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:42 -0500, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
> Eric Rees wrote:
> > We have been running IAX through OpenVPN with SSL for 6 months without
> > any trouble to Las Veags, and we are in Oklahoma. Most of the time, IAX
> > sounds better then the land line.
>
> Using UDP or us
: [Asterisk-Users] IAX over HTTP
Eric Rees wrote:
> We have been running IAX through OpenVPN with SSL for 6 months without
> any trouble to Las Veags, and we are in Oklahoma. Most of the time,
> IAX sounds better then the land line.
Using UDP or using TCP? Might want to confirm by usin
Eric Rees wrote:
We have been running IAX through OpenVPN with SSL for 6 months without
any trouble to Las Veags, and we are in Oklahoma. Most of the time, IAX
sounds better then the land line.
Using UDP or using TCP? Might want to confirm by using tcpdump.
--
Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting
after at least RTT..humm..too old to remember all TCP fancy stuff)..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julio
Arruda
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:41 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asteri
, July 22, 2005 12:41 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX over HTTP
Just remember that TCP will try to retransmit your lost voice packets,
what is not exactly of any use :-).
VPNs with IPSec and others (CIPE and some UDP 'related&
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:13:52PM -0400, Iassen Hristov wrote:
> I disagree. Isn't running it over a VPN the same thing?
>
> I have been running with no problems:
> a) a soft phone over a OpenVPN VPN (over TCP)
openvpn is a udp-based tunnel. It can work as tcp, but the default is
UDP.
> b) a so
:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jerry Glomph Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX over HTTP
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Doing IAX over TCP is
hard phone I've used Budgetone BT-102, Sipura SPA-841 and ATCOM
AT-320 (w/ IAX2 firmware).
I've had no problems. I suppose it is a matter of a good connection.
> Message: 25
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:48:09 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Jerry Glomph Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Not that it need any additional 'push' against it, :-)..
My tests with IAX over OPENVPN (on port 443) are acceptable (they do
work just fine) for basic non-user-friendly purposes.
Examples, I get my voice mail at home sometimes via this tunnel (if wife
using primary landline.
I test my dial
Doing IAX over TCP is simply a Bad Idea.
Under perfect circumstances, it will work OK, but the slightest network
disturbance will result in sound gaps/distortion and/or monster audio delay.
This is not idle UDP-boosting, I've tried it.
[Have had good results with UDP-based secure tunnel trans
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:39:04AM +0200, Gustavo García wrote:
> You can traversal a HTTPS proxy using a plain TCP connection (without SSL).
> The unique requirement of some HTTPS proxys is that the target port is 443.
>
> Then if your Asterisk listen in 443 port IAX (TCP) connections, it should
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Julio Arruda
Enviado el: jueves, 21 de julio de 2005 23:53
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX over HTTP
Rob Scott wrote:
> For work environments where you only get HTTP or HTTPS access, what is
&g
Rob Scott wrote:
For work environments where you only get HTTP or HTTPS access, what is
the feasibility of doing IAX over HTTP?
I have heard of projects such as stunnel.
Has anyone tried something like this?
I did a quick search but didn't come up with much.
I did some tests, with openvpn, f
18 matches
Mail list logo
