On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 19:43 +, Chris Bagnall wrote:
> > non-commercial is a misnomer, the patent may still apply for
> > your usage, then again it may not. The libraries that are
> > used are intels IPP which are free for non-commercial
> > non-distribution purposes, if you want to distribu
> non-commercial is a misnomer, the patent may still apply for
> your usage, then again it may not. The libraries that are
> used are intels IPP which are free for non-commercial
> non-distribution purposes, if you want to distribute you have
> to pay intel money, but that gives you the core f
