Scott Laird wrote:
> Since the system clock ticks at 1 kHz in 2.6, is there any reason why
> it can't be used (more or less) directly for timing in 2.6? That'd be
> a lot easier then hooking into a 1 kHz USB interrupt source.
Would someone who is familiar with the 2.6 series kernel please comment
On Apr 12, 2004, at 4:34 PM, Dan Austin wrote:
ztdummy will not work on a 2.6 kernel.
The 2.6 series USB core is a complete re-write. I looked through
the source, and while not a kernel hacker, I doubt ztdummy can
be easily made to work with the new USB core.
Since the system clock ticks at 1
ztdummy will not work on a 2.6 kernel.
The 2.6 series USB core is a complete re-write. I looked through
the source, and while not a kernel hacker, I doubt ztdummy can
be easily made to work with the new USB core.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Andrew D Kirch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
