Not out, nor expected in the near term.
Cory Andrews
Purchasing Manager
++
VOIPSupply.com
A Division of b2 Technologies
454 Sonwil Drive
Buffalo, NY 14225
direct - 716.250.3402
mobile - 716.907.4054
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM - b2Cory
- Original Messag
Try visiting CES next week, it might be announced there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunt, Bill
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 11:57 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Linksys S
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Anciso, Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello List,
>
> After seeing a few positive responses for the Linksys SPA-942 phones I was
> hoping to get some answers on the following questions:
>
> · How do the phones handling system wide paging? Is it simila
> * How do the phones handling system wide paging? Is it similar to the
> Polycom phones?
No idea I'm afraid, none of our clients use paging functionality.
> * Can a corporate directory be configured with the phones using
> Asterisk?
Yes and no. You can set up a directory on a per-p
So far I've never run into anything that's even /close/ to the
speakerphone quality of the Polycoms. There's no comparison on the
speakerphone between the Linksys phones and the Polycoms - it's chalk
and cheese, but by the same token that holds true for just about every
other phone too.
Ch
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 10:09 +1100, Rob Hillis wrote:
> So far I've never run into anything that's even close to the
> speakerphone quality of the Polycoms. There's no comparison on the
> speakerphone between the Linksys phones and the Polycoms - it's chalk
> and cheese, but by the same token that
The one thing I've noticed with the latest firmware I've tried (5.2.5) is
that the speaker phone quality is improved quite a bit (full duplex) but
it's very quiet, even turned all the way up.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Jared Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 10:09 +11
I agree, the latest firmware does make a difference to the speakerphone
quality, however it still doesn't hold a candle to a Polycom. That's
not to say it's /bad/, just that it's only good, not absolutely spectacular.
The sound quality from the Polycoms is in a class of it's own. It's
like c
I have 30 SPA 941 phones with Asterisk 1.2.7.1 and 1.2.9 and it works
fine. Are you canreinvite=yes ?.
I have not been notice any problem related to transferring calls (blind
and attended)
Regards
Dan Serban escribió:
I have a system running Asterisk 1.2.10 (Debian packaging) and about 50
L
Alberto Sagredo wrote:
> I have 30 SPA 941 phones with Asterisk 1.2.7.1 and 1.2.9 and it works
> fine. Are you canreinvite=yes ?.
>
> I have not been notice any problem related to transferring calls (blind
> and attended)
>
Thank you for your response, it gave me a nudge to check the
configurati
I use canreinvite=yes in my config files, and it does work, so maybe its
a spa 941 misconfiguration.
I think if nat=no sometime it has problems if you are behind NAT, but
under same network it must not fail.
Which firmware are you running on spas?
Dan Serban escribió:
Alberto Sagredo wrote:
Dan Serban wrote:
I have a system running Asterisk 1.2.10 (Debian packaging) and about 50
Linksys SPA-942 phones, after the initial config and mass deployment of
the phones everything looks like it's configured well.
When an incoming call is answered and then attempted to be "xfer'ed" via
the so
Alberto Sagredo wrote:
> I use canreinvite=yes in my config files, and it does work, so maybe its
> a spa 941 misconfiguration.
>
> I think if nat=no sometime it has problems if you are behind NAT, but
> under same network it must not fail.
>
I am behind a NAT, though the whole network is sepera
13 matches
Mail list logo
