Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread C F
When calling to the PSTN (outside VOIP or *) then you will not be able to supply the name of callerID even if you have a PRI. The only thing you can provide is the number and the receiving switch of the call is the one responsibble for attaching a name to the phone number thru SS7. If you have a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread C F
If you are using a VOIP provider and they are using just PRI (and not SS7, or they didn't configure their SS7), and change the callerID to the number you supply, then the name should show up, to whatever it is listed with the local phone company, i.e. if your phone number is 5551234 and verizon is

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread Alexander Lopez
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C F Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 6:16 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID When calling to the PSTN (outside VOIP or *) then you will not be able

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread Brian Capouch
Alexander Lopez wrote: Most Telcos do not receive the Name as part of the data in the call through the tandems b/w Telcos, they opt rather to do the lookup in the LIDB themselves. Just for the sake of completeness: most telcos do not would imply that some telcos *do*. You also say they opt to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread Tom Chandler
PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 5:30 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID OK here it goes.. Caller ID is two parts or actually three: Part 1 Number only Part 2 Number + Name

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread Tom Chandler
Capouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 5:32 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID Alexander Lopez wrote: Most Telcos do not receive the Name as part

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread Alexander Lopez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 5:30 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID OK here it goes.. Caller ID is two parts or actually three

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread Tom Chandler
: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID Caller Name is stored in a SCP. It is a TCAP transaction. The receiving switch via SS7 recieves the calling party number in the ISUP message of the SS7 datastream. It is normally in the IAM mesasge. Then a TCAP CNAME query is launched

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread Alexander Lopez
, January 09, 2005 6:54 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID TCAP is a transaction application. The CNAME, LIDB,800,.LNP and AIN database COULD be in the same SCP, but in most cases it is not. LIDB database are used

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread Tom Chandler
- Original Message - From: Alexander Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 5:55 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID Thanks. I was always under

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread C F
- From: Alexander Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 5:55 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID Thanks. I was always under the impression

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread C F
-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 5:55 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID Thanks. I was always under the impression that they were all separate tables in the same DB and that they were collectively called

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread Tom Chandler
-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 7:14 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID Without going into detail of what the query is actualy called, when the called switch make the query to find out the name, does it ask it from

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-09 Thread C F
Message - From: C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 7:14 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID Without going into detail of what the query is actualy

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Little confused about Caller ID

2005-01-08 Thread Samuel T. Cossette
Hi, I've got the Caller ID name and number working with the application SetCIDNumber and SetCIDName. [...] exten = s,3,SetCIDNumber(4183289901) exten = s,4,SetCIDName(Frank Black) exten = s,5,Dial(IAX2/prov01/${DEST}) [...] You can also use SetCallerID(Frank Black 4183289901), but no success