Stig Hess wrote:
Greetings,
I was wondering if somebody is working on a solution to the
NAT/SIP-issues? It seems to me that the problem has been identified,
is that correct?
Just hoping that someone with more skills will provide us with a
solution sooner or later...
Regards,
Stig
The so
I meant where Asterisk is behing a NAT... sorry for
the confusion.
Regards,
Stig H.
- Original Message -
From:
WipeOut
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 8:21
PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT/SIP
solution?
Stig Hess wrote
Stig Hess wrote:
I meant where Asterisk is behing a NAT... sorry for the confusion.
Regards,
Stig H.
Oh.. :)
Well thats a bigger problem.. and i doubt the "Gods of SIP" are going to
fix it any time soon.. :(
Later..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing lis
I've heard of this:
http://sarp.sourceforge.net
I have no idea if it will be of any help, but it's
an interesting programme for handleing SIP over NAT.
Brian.
- Original Message -
From:
Stig Hess
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 2:17
PM
Stig Hess wrote:
I meant where Asterisk is behing a NAT... sorry for the confusion.
Hi Stig,
If you are able to run * on your NAT'd box, then I have come up with a
work around (thanks wasim!!!) that will allow you to run an * box behind
your NAT, and still recieve and make SIP calls.
I haven't
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of WipeOut
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT/SIP solution?
Stig Hess wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I was wondering if somebody is working on a solution to the
> NAT/SIP-issues? It seems to m
Greetings,
I was wondering if somebody is working on a solution to the
NAT/SIP-issues? It seems to me that the problem has been identified,
is that correct?
Just hoping that someone with more skills will provide us with a
solution sooner or later...
Regards,
Stig
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_v
There are several SIP aware NAT routers. Any Cisco router with a
firewall load has SIP aware NAT. There is at least one other brand of
SIP aware NAT router out there, but I don't recall the brand.
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 17:26, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
> Nikotel has a solution and one participa
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 00:00, Eric Wieling wrote:
> There are several SIP aware NAT routers. Any Cisco router with a
> firewall load has SIP aware NAT. There is at least one other brand of
> SIP aware NAT router out there, but I don't recall the brand.
>
> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 17:26, Uriel Car
I had been warned about British sense of humour, but this even a South
American like myself find funny.
Uriel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of WipeOut
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leif Madsen
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT/SIP solution?
Stig Hess wrote:
> I meant where Asterisk is behing a NAT... sorry for the confusion.
Hi Stig,
If you are able to run *
Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
Leif:
I take it that the * on the GW machine remains in the middle of the call
between SIP and the Nat'ed *, correct?
I also suspect that you will be using IAX over Ethernet (to avoid
compression/decompression delays), correct?
Great work!
You'd be correct. IAX is over Et
12 matches
Mail list logo
