Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-25 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Monday, Jun 23, 2003, at 10:34 America/Los_Angeles, James Golovich wrote: No point in reinventing the wheel here. PersistentPerl (aka SpeedyCGI) can eliminate the startup cost for using perl with AGIs. It works great, and even allows the processes to reuse database connections Speed is not th

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-24 Thread Michael Baird
t; >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ask Bjørn > >Hansen > >Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:12 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl > > > > > > > >On Tuesday, Jun 17, 2003, at 20:43 America/Los_Angeles,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
Great work! Uriel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dylan VanHerpen Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl Remove the space behind .com, like so http://asterisk

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread Dylan VanHerpen
Ask Bjørn Hansen Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl On Tuesday, Jun 17, 2003, at 20:43 America/Los_Angeles, Anthony Minessale wrote: Here is a copy of the first release (comments appreciated) http://asterisk.650dialup.com

RE: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
For some reason the page cannot be found. http://asterisk.650dialup.com  what does it do? Uriel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ask Bjørn Hansen Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Monday 23 June 2003 03:24 pm, Jordan Peterson wrote: > Jerk And one who is contributing to the development of Asterisk. If you aren't the patient type and would like immediate answers to your questions, I strongly advise calling Digium and buying a support contract. The support techs are very

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread Jordan Peterson
Jerk On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 13:02, Steven Critchfield wrote: > replying to 2 other threads with your problem is not the way to get > people to answer your question. If you search the archive you will see > that voice modems are not really supported. This is why you don't hear > audio. Now quit bei

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread Steven Critchfield
replying to 2 other threads with your problem is not the way to get people to answer your question. If you search the archive you will see that voice modems are not really supported. This is why you don't hear audio. Now quit being impatient and _DEMANDING_ support. On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 13:07, Jo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread Jordan Peterson
Would anyone be so kind as to explain why no voice is heard through the phone when calling? Thanks. On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 10:34, James Golovich wrote: > No point in reinventing the wheel here. PersistentPerl (aka SpeedyCGI) > can eliminate the startup cost for using perl with AGIs. > > It work

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread James Golovich
No point in reinventing the wheel here. PersistentPerl (aka SpeedyCGI) can eliminate the startup cost for using perl with AGIs. It works great, and even allows the processes to reuse database connections James On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Anthony Minessale wrote: > That is probably possible and not t

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread Anthony Minessale
That is probably possible and not too difficult.   I learned what AGI was about 30 minutes after I was finished with the last revision of app_perl where I added support to launch a perl function in a thread    (BTW I am suspicious that you may ironically need perl with no threads compiled for i

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-23 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Tuesday, Jun 17, 2003, at 20:43 America/Los_Angeles, Anthony Minessale wrote: Here is a copy of the first release (comments appreciated)   http://asterisk.650dialup.com  Although I haven't had time to play with it: very neat! - ask -- http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-21 Thread Mark Spencer
> I was telling a story of what inspired me to write this module that > embeds a perl interpreter into the asterisk process and to see if > anyone was interested in it (IT'S AN EXPERIMENT) What I get are > several replies telling me to RTFM and I would no longer need to solve > the problem that ins

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-17 Thread Anthony Minessale
ok,   I'm not opposed to finding other ways to do the same thing.   I got the impression my opening comments explaining how the apple fell on my head may have been the only part anyone took notice of while skimming over all these articles so I'll chill and assume it's not flaming =)   Here is a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-17 Thread Peter Brown
Anthony, Don't take the comments about your work too seriously. We like to do things the easiest way, and its their way of helping you . I liked your work. Could you show us a database example of your work. Peter At 14:19 17/06/2003 -0700, you wrote: >ok forget it I was telling a story

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-17 Thread Steven Critchfield
While I can only comment on what was on the list and not about what may have been sent privately, I think some of the comments should have been taken more lightly as they just showed you more ways to do it. I admit that it is cool to have been able to do that, I have reservations about "mod_perl"

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-17 Thread Anthony Minessale
ok forget it   I was telling a story of what inspired me to write this module that embeds a perl interpreter into the asterisk process and to see if anyone was interested in it (IT'S AN EXPERIMENT) What I get are several replies telling me to RTFM and I would no longer need to solve the pro

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-17 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 10:22, Anthony Minessale wrote: > I just made my first 2 modules for asterisk (The 1st one is > depriciated already). > > I was annoyed that i couldn't get GotoIf to take any expressions > besides a boolean then i made a module to mimic gotoif and parse a > few expressions l

Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Module app_perl

2003-06-17 Thread Martin Pycko
Of course you can use Gotoif with expressions. Gotoif,$[${VAR} > 12]?1|4:1|5 Martin On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Anthony Minessale wrote: > > I just made my first 2 modules for asterisk (The 1st one is depriciated already). > > I was annoyed that i couldn't get GotoIf to take any expressions besides a