--On Saturday, January 17, 2004 8:49 PM -0500 John Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ideas welcome for more text; I may have another timeslot with Allison
early next week in which there will be some leftover room for additional
words. Short phrases and meaningful sets of words for existing
appli
I just found another thread showing where the files are hiding. Thank you
for recording the first two below already - greatly appreciated. Please
note that the third is a new one, however.
For exact intonation of the below, Allison can dial 805/692-2323 and then
x234. You'll hear the first t
At 7:25 PM -0800 1/17/04, Ken Alker wrote:
--On Saturday, January 17, 2004 8:49 PM -0500 John Todd
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ideas welcome for more text; I may have another timeslot with Allison
early next week in which there will be some leftover room for additional
words. Short phrases and
John Todd wrote:
The soundfiles I submitted earlier today have been cleaned up, and added
to the Digium CVS server in a more formal manner. Also, some of the
really bad formatting in my .txt description file has been rectified.
All of the sounds on my website are now on the Digium site, and I
great!!
but when will asterisk use some of these new babies?;))
it would be really great to have app_queue saying "you are currently caller
number 7 in the queue" (="you-are-curr-call-num.gsm" + "7.gsm" +
"in-the-queue.gsm")
that would be really really great.
when speaking of app_queue. i th
John Todd said:
>
>...
> Ideas welcome for more text; I may have another timeslot with Allison
> early next week in which there will be some leftover room for
> additional words. Short phrases and meaningful sets of words for
> existing applications are desired; please don't give me words for
> ap
At 2:55 PM +0100 1/18/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New sounds also now in CVS
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:55:25 +0100 (CET)
John Todd said:
...
Ideas welcome for more text; I may have another
...
Quoting John Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>As to the specifications of directories for sounds in certain
> groups: yes, I think that is a good idea, but I am unsure how to
> implement it. Mark and I touched on that last night while adding the
> sounds to the CVS server, but I told
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 11:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New sounds also now in CVS
>
[...]
> The index for
Is probably not the best way to handle it, but you could store all sounds
in one directory and then create another directory that has subdirectories
like weather. The items that are most frequently used would then be
symlinked to the original sound directory. Just another way of organizing
it. I
.5638
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Mindworks Wireless
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 1:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New sounds also now in CVS
>
>
> Is probably not
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 22:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It will probably be impossible to divide audio clips into different
> directories without duplication of clips or massive headaches determining
> direcories. My suggested method of handling this is to have all of the sounds
> in one dir
On Monday 19 January 2004 08:34, Eric Wieling wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 22:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It will probably be impossible to divide audio clips into
> > different directories without duplication of clips or massive
> > headaches determining direcories. My suggested method of h
> This is actually a bad idea. While many filesystems today have binary
> tree directory structures, some still do not. Allowing too many
> miscellaneous sounds in a single directory is not only difficult to
> browse, it may also consume inordinate amounts of CPU, memory, and
> user time attempti
On Monday 19 January 2004 13:37, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > This is actually a bad idea. While many filesystems today have
> > binary tree directory structures, some still do not. Allowing
> > too many miscellaneous sounds in a single directory is not only
> > difficult to browse, it may also co
> Although the OS may cache that information, the userland process
> can take quite some time to process a very full directory. I've had
> this happen quite a few times with Linux ext2 filesystems, where the
> fileglob * exceeded bash's limit of 32,768 characters. /bin/ls on
> those directories
I keep noticing the references to words related to weather in this thread
and I am getting more and more curious; why the weather related words for a
PBX?
What other broad topics for words exist right now besides those that are
PBX specific and weather-related?
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:25:46AM -0800, Ken Alker wrote:
> What other broad topics for words exist right now besides those that are
> PBX specific and weather-related?
I'd like prepaid calling phrases. PIN's, card numbers, account numbers,
balance...
As a sugestion, store the sounds in a soundlib tree, hashed or
categorised (boolean (yes, no, true,false, up, down etc.),numbers,
caledar(day, date, time etc), state, weather etc) and dont duplicate any
sounds then make a sounds tree with virtual categories and sim link to
the files needed.
Thi
At 8:43 AM + 1/20/04, Miguel A Paraz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:25:46AM -0800, Ken Alker wrote:
What other broad topics for words exist right now besides those that are
PBX specific and weather-related?
I'd like prepaid calling phrases. PIN's, card numbers, account numbers,
balance..
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:47:03AM -0500, John Todd wrote:
> At 8:43 AM + 1/20/04, Miguel A Paraz wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:25:46AM -0800, Ken Alker wrote:
> >> What other broad topics for words exist right now besides those that are
> >> PBX specific and weather-related?
> >
> >
> >
Behalf Of Ken Alker
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 3:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New sounds also now in CVS
>
>
> I keep noticing the references to words related to weather in
> this thread
> and I am getting more and more curious; why
22 matches
Mail list logo
