You can eliminate the set CallerID line. This will just set the
variable back to itself. Asterisk will pass the callerid from one
span to the next.
You can use a GotoIF to set the callerid to something else if it is
blank or marked as Private:
exten = s,1,GoToIf($[${CALLERID(num)} = ]?2:3)
- Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Question
You can eliminate the set CallerID line. This will just set the
variable back to itself. Asterisk will pass the callerid from one
span to the next.
You can use a GotoIF to set the callerid to something else if it is
blank
hmm from what i have seen this is not supposed to be.. the info is still
there but should not be used in case of privacy..
zap show channels always show last info till a span refresh.. but the
privacy should indeed replace those with Privacy.
Maybe it could be a bug ,
On 8/9/07, Jeremy Mann
You can also use * and linux to partialize the T1. You better plan on
spending a lot of time on making it work. You have to install the Linux
packages to split the line. NON trival. Works great,
though.
Paul
Paul Mahler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.signate.com
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 21:16 -0700, Tim
Let me further clarify this. I am looking to buy the TE110P. The website says
that The TE110P with Asterisk will route voice and data traffic, and eliminate
the need for an external router. How does this work? How is the data
transferred - as a pass-through like a NAT to the server's
Tim Chandler wrote:
Let me further clarify this. I am looking to buy the TE110P. The website says that The TE110P with Asterisk will route voice and data traffic, and eliminate the need for an external router. How does this work? How is the data transferred - as a pass-through like a NAT to
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 21:16 -0700, Tim Chandler wrote:
Let me further clarify this. I am looking to buy the TE110P. The
website says that The TE110P with Asterisk will route voice and data
traffic, and eliminate the need for an external router. How does
this work? How is the data
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI Question
First of all you should have callprogress=no and immediate=no for any
kind
of a PRI. Also why is your d-channel going down ? Can you send a trace
pri intense debug span 1
anyone else run into PRI implementations that they cannot make work
with Asterisk?
Barry
-Original Message-
From: Martin Pycko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI Question
Can you do remote loopup from
This may have nothing to do with it but have you verified your timing?
Make sure one end of the T1 is using an internal clock and the other
end is using timing off of the T1.
Don Pobanz
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:37 PM, Barry Porch
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My switch doesn't let
3300, by the way.
Thanks for your help!
Barry
-Original Message-
From: Martin Pycko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI Question
First of all you should have callprogress=no and immediate=no for any
First of all you should have callprogress=no and immediate=no for any kind
of a PRI. Also why is your d-channel going down ? Can you send a trace
pri intense debug span 1 ?
regards
Martin
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Barry Porch wrote:
I managed to get Asterisk working with my PBX using T1, now I am
12 matches
Mail list logo