Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI for Data and Voice
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, David Norton wrote:
Currently I only have 1 PRI which I am using for dial-in customers.
The line is connected to a Portmaster3. I have never used more than 10
concurrent channels. The calls can be both analog
Do you have a config sample on how to handle digital PPP sessions in Asterisk?
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:16:51 +0100 (CET), Peter Svensson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, David Norton wrote:
Currently I only have 1 PRI which I am using for dial-in customers. The line
is
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Eric Bishop wrote:
Do you have a config sample on how to handle digital PPP sessions in Asterisk?
No, but there may be examples in the wiki:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-pagehistory.php?page=Asterisk+zapraspreview=3
http://www.digium.com/downloads/ppp.txt
Dave, howzit
You can use asterisk with a quad E1 card to divide your E1. So
anyone who dials in using 1234 for example, route to your
portmaster and anyone who dials in using 1235 use for IVR/voip,
whatever.
Good luck
Regards
Clive
On 29 Jan 2005 at 15:11, David Norton wrote:
Hi,
Currently
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, David Norton wrote:
Currently I only have 1 PRI which I am using for dial-in customers. The line
is connected to a Portmaster3. I have never used more than 10 concurrent
channels. The calls can be both analog or ISDN. It would be a waste to order
another PRI for my
David Norton wrote:
Hi,
Currently I only have 1 PRI which I am using for dial-in customers.
The line is connected to a Portmaster3. I have never used more than
10 concurrent channels. The calls can be both analog or ISDN. It
would be a waste to order another PRI for my Asterisk box. Is
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 11:45 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
David Norton wrote:
Hi,
Currently I only have 1 PRI which I am using for dial-in customers.
The line is connected to a Portmaster3. I have never used more than
10 concurrent channels. The calls can be both analog or ISDN. It
I met Sangoma guys this Tuesday, and got a AFT102 for evaluation.
Right now I am in progress to develop a * channel driver for AFT10*
devices.
In that case you will have much more flexibility and to use all their
API.
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 11:45 -0500, Jim Van
