Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Problem

2011-08-16 Thread Shaun Ruffell
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:31:54AM -0400, Eric Merkel wrote: I am having a problem with a new PRI turn-up on dahdi 2.5.0 and asterisk 1.8.5 that I have not seen before. The PRI is setup as B8ZS, ESF and the span shows up and ok. This PRI is merely a crossover T1 going into an old DC0 class 5

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Problem

2011-08-16 Thread Eric Merkel
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:31:54AM -0400, Eric Merkel wrote: I am having a problem with a new PRI turn-up on dahdi 2.5.0 and asterisk 1.8.5 that I have not seen before. The PRI is setup as B8ZS, ESF and the span shows

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Problem

2011-08-16 Thread Doug Lytle
Eric Merkel wrote: The error pretty much right away. The first thing that comes to my mind is to check your cable. Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. --

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI problem [SOLVED]

2009-04-12 Thread Steven J. Douglas
Thanks to all who replied. The problem was due to a faulty NTU box from the telco. It has been up for almost a week now without any downtime. Regards, Steve Steven J. Douglas wrote: Thanks for the tip, Harry. I will try that when I have exhausted all avenue. My problem is that if I upgrade

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI problem

2009-04-06 Thread Steven J. Douglas
Thanks for the tip, Harry. I will try that when I have exhausted all avenue. My problem is that if I upgrade to 1.4.24 and DAHDI, I'll break other stuffs. In my current set up, the PRI did work for a long period of time (7 hours) before going into this unreliable mode (up and down). I'm

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI problem

2009-04-02 Thread Harry Vangberg
I had the exact same problem and errors some time ago (search the archives for PRI dropping #2) using Asterisk 1.4.18, Zaptel and a Digium TE121. I tried all kind of things, had telco technicians come out and whatnot. The solution was two-folded - 1) I reinstalled my server, 2) I updated to

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI problem

2009-03-31 Thread Brandon B.
Try a T1 crossover cable: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/crossover+T1+cable On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Steven J. Douglas stev...@moij.bizwrote: Hi guys, I've been trying to get my ISDN-10 line up for the past few days, but its been going up and down. I am using OpenVox

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI problem

2009-03-31 Thread Steven J. Douglas
Hi Brandon, When using the current straight cable, it sometimes worked i.e. I can make calls from the PSTN into the asterisk. Do you still think that I should try a crossover cable? Thanks. Regards, Steve. Brandon B. wrote: Try a T1 crossover cable:

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI problem, pri_fixup_principle: Call specified, but not found? [SOLVED]

2007-05-27 Thread Carlos G Mendioroz
Issue was that zapata.conf was specifying trunkgroup for the spans. This was adding a DS1 Identifier to the setup channel ID, which the CO does not recognize and so it assigns its own pick of channel. This was causing a move which asterisk does not cope with. (Actually, initial channel id being

RE: [asterisk-users] PRI problem, pri_fixup_principle: Call specified, but not found?

2007-05-24 Thread John Treble
in a PRI setup, the receiving side is changing the B channel at proceeding. Please post the layer 3 trace for this call scenario so that members of this forum can help you debug your problem. John Treble Ottawa, Canada -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI problem, pri_fixup_principle: Call specified, but not found?

2007-05-24 Thread Carlos G Mendioroz
Here... Please advise if any special flags/options are needed. [ 02 01 01 27 ] Supervisory frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ] N(R): 019 P/F: 1 0 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 18 to (but not including) 19 -- Since

Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem

2006-01-08 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Sunday 08 January 2006 05:48, Joseph Rothstein wrote: When I dial my zap channel it does not seem to go beyond the first priority. exten = _0.,1,Dial(Zap/g1/${EXTEN:2},,f) exten = _0.,2,Noop(${DIALSTATUS}) No application continues upon hangup unless there are special conditions which

RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem

2006-01-08 Thread Steve Totaro
If you mean the call keeps ringing, then the reason why is you have no timeout in your dial statement. When there is no timeout the system will never give up on line one so it can continue to the second priority. Thanks, Steve _ From: Joseph Rothstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem

2006-01-06 Thread C F
Looks like you got a configuration issue, you should test for the ${DIALSTATUS} variable and set the signalling to the phones based on that. You can do: exten = _X.,1,Dial(Zap/g1/${EXTEN}) exten = _X.,2,Goto,s-${DIALSTATUS},1) exten = s-CANCEL,1,Playtones(congestion) exten = s-CANCEL,2,Congestion

Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem

2005-07-12 Thread Matt Fredrickson
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:59:42PM +0800, matt001 wrote: currently we are able to use our USA sip phone to conenct into the E1 box, but still unable to dial out to chinese phone numbers. They said from their ISDN switch console, it shows D channel not connected to the voip server yet. here

Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem???

2004-05-24 Thread Bruce Komito
Tim, I would double check the timing. It seems odd that you would supply clock rather than the switch, and if you get clock slips, that could certainly account for what you are seeing. Feel free to contact me off-list if you need more info or have any questions. Bruce Komito High Sierra

RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem???

2004-05-24 Thread Timothy R. McKee
To: Timothy R. McKee Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem??? Tim, I would double check the timing. It seems odd that you would supply clock rather than the switch, and if you get clock slips, that could certainly account for what you are seeing. Feel free to contact me off

RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem???

2004-05-24 Thread Bruce Komito
, May 24, 2004 08:30 To: Timothy R. McKee Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem??? Tim, I would double check the timing. It seems odd that you would supply clock rather than the switch, and if you get clock slips, that could certainly account for what you are seeing

RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem???

2004-05-24 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 07:37, Timothy R. McKee wrote: I thought the timing priority setting was for which incoming timing signal was used as the primary clock source, so I set the PRI as the highest priority clock source. In the telco world this is that way it normally works. Does the

RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem???

2004-05-24 Thread Scott Stingel
Hi Tim- Except for maybe eliminating the channel bank as a secondary source of timing, your conf files look fine. I notice that you've used 2 as the build-out (line length) parameter - I take it that your asterisk box is not right next to the switch. Anyway, I've never seen build-out make much

RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem???

2004-05-24 Thread Timothy R. McKee
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Stingel Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 12:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem??? Hi Tim- Except for maybe eliminating the channel bank as a secondary source of timing, your conf files look

Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI problem???

2004-05-23 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 21:52, Timothy R. McKee wrote: My problem lies in random intermittent drops of calls. The entire PRI seems to disappear, dropping all current established calls. I see occasional printouts on an asterisk management console showing all 23 B channels resetting with no