RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom Phones shorter than /24 netmasks

2005-06-07 Thread Chris Coulthurst
I just assigned one yesterday in a 10.X.X.X network with a netmast of 255.0.0.0, and had no problems..FYI. Chris Coulthurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Watts |Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom Phones shorter than /24 netmasks

2005-06-07 Thread Alexander Lopez
Can you try a 'more standard' boundary? Like 255.255.0.0 or 255.0.0.0 ??? If so it (polycom) may not understand CIDR. You may want to look at implementing a VLAN... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Watts Sent: Tuesday, June 07,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom Phones shorter than /24 netmasks

2005-06-07 Thread Charlie Watts
Interesting. I wonder if only classful things work. I'll report back when I have more info. Thanks for the datapoint. Chris Coulthurst wrote: I just assigned one yesterday in a 10.X.X.X network with a netmast of 255.0.0.0, and had no problems..FYI. Chris Coulthurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]