We run the same benchmarks on PC servers and get a small fraction of that
throughput with streams. If you're doing better, that's great.
The facile response is "how much money do you have" since it's a tuning
issue. For example, you get more throughput if you hold the IVR in RAM.
But, as you k
There you go. "if it is doing no other work" is key phrase. A lot of PC can do
that these days if all it has to do is re-route packets to different
destinations, and guess what, if you make sure silence compression is turned on
at the endpoints, you can claim even more streams can be passed thro
One of our Telephony Server 5000 modules will throughput between 2,000 and
2,500 SIP calls with streams if it is doing no other work. One of these days
we will again announce the details of the ongoing benchmarks that we perform
with the help of system engineers from a major computer manufacturer.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Wai Wu wrote:
I don't think they are doing it with one Asterisk box. They did say
"one rack of servers". Well, that might mean up to 50 computers if they
are using blade servers.
At 11:21 AM -0800 2/2/06, William Boehlke wrote:
Signate has claimed 5,000 streams, or 2,500
I don't think they are doing it with one Asterisk box. They did say "one rack
of servers". Well, that might mean up to 50 computers if they are using blade
servers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Todd
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006
