RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread Rich Adamson
and let me look at it and see if I can fix it? > > > > bkw > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vic Cross > > > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:04 AM >

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread brian
ehalf Of brian > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:26 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960) > > Care to find me on IRC and let me look at it and see if I can fix it? > > bkw > > > > -Original Message---

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread brian
sterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960) > > On Fri, 21 May 2004, brian wrote: > > > Get ethereal traces where we can see timestamps and we can figure it > out. > > I did. See a post a few days ago (in the AArgh thread). But I'm the > "chan

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread Vic Cross
On Fri, 21 May 2004, brian wrote: > Get ethereal traces where we can see timestamps and we can figure it out. I did. See a post a few days ago (in the AArgh thread). But I'm the "chan_capi problem" guy... :( > Other than that I can't reproduce the problem, trust me I HAVE tried. Appreciate i

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread brian
> That's not even close to an acceptable solution. Try this for > perspective... > A new service provider is getting ready to provide iax termination service > to asterisk users throughout the world. Lots of systems and agreements in > place. There is "no" usable cvs code to start the offering. You

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread Rich Adamson
> > Problems (just for bkw): > > 1. Stable does not include the "major" iax2 fixes that were corrected last > > month 2. Head has a iax2/gsm sequence number issue > > both result in choppy audio when transcoded to sip on Cisco phones. > > > > As has been noted MULTIPLE TIMES on this list, there is

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread brian
> I presented a stopgap solution to this list earlier this week (TDMoE > between > two * boxes to give you clean RTP timestamps to the Ciscos connected to > *1, > and *2 to the world) > That's just silly to have to do this. Collect me some timestamp info so we can see this invalid timestamp non-s

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread brian
> You're not the only one with this frustration / show stopper, and > regardless > of what bkw says, its a serious problem that for whatever reason, a few > arrogant people refuse to acknowledge. Get ethereal traces where we can see timestamps and we can figure it out. My phones aren't doing this.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
> Problems (just for bkw): > 1. Stable does not include the "major" iax2 fixes that were corrected last > month 2. Head has a iax2/gsm sequence number issue > both result in choppy audio when transcoded to sip on Cisco phones. > > As has been noted MULTIPLE TIMES on this list, there is no realisti

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RTP timestamps (was: AArgh, * and the 7960)

2004-05-21 Thread Rich Adamson
> > As you already know, the timestamp problem with cisco phones dropping > > packets has been associated with at least two channels. > > > > Although iax & capi are getting hammered, the real issue seems to be > > that no one has opened a high sev TAC case to fix the root problem. > > If I was