But I guess I'm wondering ... does the present licensing model discourage other vendors from contributing to *? I'm not sure Sangoma developers could sign the disclaimers even if they wanted to ... but then again I don't know if there's anyone there with anything to offer. I would think that that f
Darren Nickerson wrote:
"Brian West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Aidan isn't a troll he does raise a very
valid point.
Which was, I presume, that companies that once collaborated on Asterisk
development such as Sangoma don't find themselves on friendly terms
with Digium now that the
"Brian West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Aidan isn't a troll he does raise a very valid point.
Which was, I presume, that companies that once collaborated on Asterisk
development such as Sangoma don't find themselves on friendly terms with
Digium now that they're competing for * implementors $$s?
Aidan isn't a troll he does raise a very valid point.
/b
On Jul 23, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Brian Capouch wrote:
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
Is this indicative to how Digium people respond to everything
(including the
company that built the first asterisk-supporting hardware still
continuing
to make
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
Is this indicative to how Digium people respond to everything (including the
company that built the first asterisk-supporting hardware still continuing
to make hardware which Asterisk works on)?
Nothwithstanding the almost-unparseable syntax, let's not feed this
troll .
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:26 +0100, Kevin Walsh wrote:
> Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Friday 22 July 2005 12:04, Lee Howard wrote:
> > > Well, I'm sure that was an added bonus. :-) Free work and free money.
> > > It reminds me of a certain Dire Straits lyric.
> > >
> > Yes but
Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday 22 July 2005 12:04, Lee Howard wrote:
> > Well, I'm sure that was an added bonus. :-) Free work and free money.
> > It reminds me of a certain Dire Straits lyric.
> >
> Yes but are the chicks free?
>
All except for the binary ones.
--
_/
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Friday 22 July 2005 12:04, Lee Howard wrote:
Well, I'm sure that was an added bonus. :-) Free work and free money.
It reminds me of a certain Dire Straits lyric.
Yes but are the chicks free?
Were there many chicks at Astricon?
Lee.
__
On Friday 22 July 2005 12:04, Lee Howard wrote:
> Well, I'm sure that was an added bonus. :-) Free work and free money.
> It reminds me of a certain Dire Straits lyric.
Yes but are the chicks free?
-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@li
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
The first two statements are true; the third is not.
While you can certainly distribute the code you contribute to us via any
other means you wish (under any other license you wish, including the
GPL), the Digium Asterisk source tree cannot acce
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
So what are they planning on doing with the Google Summer of Code results?
http://code.google.com/summfaq.html#what_licenses_will_i_have
What licenses will I have to choose from?
This depends on your mentoring organization. For instance if Google
is your mentoring or
11 matches
Mail list logo