: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Strategy for a stable IAXy
On Thursday 10 February 2005 20:35, Colin Anderson wrote:
Why would someone choose these over other boxes, such as the Sipura
2000
and 3000?
Because I want NAT traversal and a low bandwidth codec. That's the
whole point of IAX2 as opposed
So, which way to go? IAX or SIP? IAXy or Sipura?
I prefer by far IAX
All ip phones use SIP right?
Nope, now there's IAX hardphone, like there : http://www.iaxtalk.com/
hth
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Anton Krall wrote:
How do you make SIP work behind NAT without having to change anything on the
firewall for example, those cable modems
So far, Ive tested this using softphones and only iaxphone has been able to
work using IAX, eye lite or something for FWD that uses SIP says it cant
connect
