: Sunday, October 24, 2004 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
I do some script type programing and have seen this in other uses. IMHO, it
would be easier to program this way. Single # go
hey are they can press ##.
>
> Or am I missing something? :)
>
> S.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lyle Giese
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:52 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discuss
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lyle Giese
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
I don't know but it's IMHO, this should be just the opp
I don't know but it's IMHO, this should be just the opposite. Single # for
a transfer and double ## to send the key on as DTMF. How many objects in a
dialplan start with a #?
Lyle
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Barton Hodges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "s
> clearly * is receiving the #, as ## does do a transfer. so why
> is a single # not being sent onward as dtmf?
I noticed on X-Lite that # in a dialstring is sent URL-encoded or similar,
and Asterisk doesn't understand it.
Could this be something similar? Perhaps sip debug will reveal?
Stev
99% of the companies I call that say hit # after entering your
response, doesnt actually require the #.. I've only encountered a few
places that if you don't hit the # it ignores your response,
eventually sending you to an operator or hangs up on you.
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:37:09 -0700, Randy Bus
