César Davi Ávila do Nascimento wrote:
Hi All,
I have a question for you:
- SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well
Do you agree with this sentence?
Depends on the NAT/firewall in question, you can also alleviate some of
these issues using STUN and sip proxing...
--
Best regards,
Duane
I have a question for you:
- SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well
Do you agree with this sentence?
Depends. Asterisk behind a nat box tends to be an implementation
problem limited by the knowledge of the person doing the implementation
and somewhat by the functionality implemented within
Thanks a lot!
Regards
César
- Original Message -
From: Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT
I have a question for you
I have a question for you:
- SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well
Do you agree with this sentence?
Complete and utter crap (if you assume a few things).
SIP w/NAT works just fine if:
Asterisk itself is not behind NAT
You do not want to use SIP reinvites
You use some form of NAT Keepalive*
I'll agree with that sentence. There are many times when even STUN and so on
isn't going to help. In Guatemala, a lot of people end up with private IPs,
behind two NATs, etc. I've seen them aggressively timeout connections, limit
the range of ports available for NAT (to a ridiculously low number),
2005 09:50:31 -0600
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT
I'll agree with that sentence. There are many times when even STUN and
so on
isn't going to help. In Guatemala, a lot of people end up with private
IPs,
behind two NATs, etc. I've seen them aggressively timeout connections,
limit
Eric Wieling wrote:
I have a question for you:
- SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well
Do you agree with this sentence?
Complete and utter crap (if you assume a few things).
SIP w/NAT works just fine if:
. . . .
Hardly complete and utter crap when it has to be followed by a laundry
list of
, 31 Jan 2005 09:50:31 -0600
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT
I'll agree with that sentence. There are many times when even STUN and
so on
isn't going to help. In Guatemala, a lot of people end up with private
IPs,
behind two NATs, etc. I've seen them aggressively timeout connections
