RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Trunk config / Least Cost Routing

2003-08-14 Thread John Todd
See answers in-line. At 4:14 PM -0400 8/7/03, Wade Weppler wrote: From: Wade Weppler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Trunk config / Least Cost Routing Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:14:51 -0400 Ah, good idea! I assume even a global

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Trunk config / Least Cost Routing

2003-08-14 Thread Wade Weppler
Why use an AGI? This seems to be easily done with the dialplan, unless I'm missing some additional sophistication that you're not mentioning. Our local area (Toronto) has some extreme overlapping areacode problems that require some logic to decipher. I've been able to pull exchange

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Trunk config / Least Cost Routing

2003-08-09 Thread John Todd
From: Wade Weppler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Trunk config / Least Cost Routing Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:48:01 -0400 Why use an AGI? This seems to be easily done with the dialplan, unless I'm missing some additional

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Trunk config / Least Cost Routing

2003-08-08 Thread Wade Weppler
To give you an idea of how interesting this would be: I could have a peer with your office A, and if you had the appropriate filters on your announcements to me, I would know how to reach office B without going through office A or a PSTN connection. If you added a line in office B, it would