Re: [asterisk-users] TDM cards

On 2020-02-16 16:48, Dovid Bender wrote: Hi, It's been forever since I dealt with POTS lines. We have a client that needs FXS and FXO support. If memory serves correct we used the TDM400P with fxs_gs/fxo_gs. What's the equivalent of that card today? Wow. Lotta replies. I haven't done POTS

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM cards

On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 2:49 PM Dovid Bender wrote: > Hi, > > It's been forever since I dealt with POTS lines. We have a client that > needs FXS and FXO support. If memory serves correct we used the TDM400P > with fxs_gs/fxo_gs. What's the equivalent of that card today? > Digium, Inc. Wildcard

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM Fax

On 08/19/2012 11:45 AM, Lee Howard wrote: On 08/17/2012 04:58 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: On 08/17/2012 06:08 AM, Eric Wieling wrote: Has anyone experimented with increasing the DAHDI chunk size in improve fax reliability? If so, did it help, hurt, or not make any difference? I haven't found

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM Fax

On 08/17/2012 04:58 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: On 08/17/2012 06:08 AM, Eric Wieling wrote: Has anyone experimented with increasing the DAHDI chunk size in improve fax reliability? If so, did it help, hurt, or not make any difference? I haven't found issues related to the DAHDI chunk size. Th

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM Fax

On 08/17/2012 06:08 AM, Eric Wieling wrote: Has anyone experimented with increasing the DAHDI chunk size in improve fax reliability? If so, did it help, hurt, or not make any difference? I haven't found issues related to the DAHDI chunk size. The main thing which used to hurt FAXing with Aste

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM calls fall after some minutes

Late reply: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:19:36PM +0100, luca capra wrote: > Hello, > > it's my first post on this list, I hope not to bore youwith my novice > questions.. > > We're using a TDM400 with 3 fxo modules connected to pstn. > Call goes inbound/outbound correctly, after playing a bit on s

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400p and Noise on the line

> Hi > > I wonder if anyone has any sugestions > > > I have had a TDM400 for a couple of years, and I have always had problems > with noise on the line, so tonight I have been doing some research and have > found that if I load the CPU dahdi_test has almost perfect results and no > noise > >

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400 hardware(?) issue

On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 11:53 -0700, Greg Woods wrote: > > the machine will lock up because the TDM board or the Dahdi > > driver goes south. /var/log/messages starts filling up with repeated > > messages: > > > > kernel: TDM PCI Master abort > > it's entirely possible that a flaky video card > i

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400 hardware(?) issue

Hi I use one of these http://www.soekris.com/net5501.htm fairly cheap to buy and to run, I have a tdm410 in there and it has worked flawlessly I am running debian i386 on the box - it also doubles as my firewall/router/vpn/adsl box. I do have one problem with the box (but I have seen on other bo

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400 hardware(?) issue

> the machine will lock up because the TDM board or the Dahdi > driver goes south. /var/log/messages starts filling up with repeated > messages: > > kernel: TDM PCI Master abort Thank you to everyone who has taken the time to reply. First I am going to apply the "fix what you know is broken" pr

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400 hardware(?) issue

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > If my Wildcard TDM board is bad, is there anything I can do about it, or > am I just S.O.L. after this much time? The blasted card costs as much as > a new machine; either way I can't afford it right now. I don't want to > abandon asterisk as it

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400 hardware(?) issue

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Darrick Hartman wrote: > On 12/21/2009 05:34 PM, Steve Totaro wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Greg Woods > > wrote: > > > > I am having to abandon asterisk after having used it for 2.5 years > due > > to this

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400 hardware(?) issue

On 12/21/2009 05:34 PM, Steve Totaro wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Greg Woods > wrote: > > I am having to abandon asterisk after having used it for 2.5 years due > to this problem. Every couple of days (sometimes more often, sometimes > less)

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400 hardware(?) issue

Second on Sangoma, don't forget that their hardware has lifetime warranties, but the OP already stated his budget was too tight. Thanks, Steve Totaro On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Bruce Nik wrote: > My experience with Sangoma cards has been amazing. They always provide > support to not only

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400 hardware(?) issue

My experience with Sangoma cards has been amazing. They always provide support to not only Asterisk based systems but also to others. They are just amazing and as their slogan says, "because it must work" it just does without failiure. I never used a Digium card, but I never seen any other company

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400 hardware(?) issue

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > I am having to abandon asterisk after having used it for 2.5 years due > to this problem. Every couple of days (sometimes more often, sometimes > less), the machine will lock up because the TDM board or the Dahdi > driver goes south. /var/log/m

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 01:24:01PM +0300, B.Masoud @ SH wrote: > Thanks, > > What if I want to group a TDM2400 into 3 groups, r0/0 to r0/7 , r1/8 to > r1/15 , r2/16 to r2/23 > How to do that? DAHDI channel numbers are 1-based and not 0-based. HEnce you should probably use 1-8, 9-16 and 17-24 gro

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

, October 05, 2009 10:05 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing B.Masoud @ SH schrieb: > I have defined the card g0 to have 24 channels, but > every time I try to call, if all ports are off the call always go to the > first

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

B.Masoud @ SH schrieb: > I have defined the card g0 to have 24 channels, but > every time I try to call, if all ports are off the call always go to the > first port, how can I balance the calls over all ports??? http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+ZAP+channels#DialingaGroup Dial(Dahdi/r0

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

. Thanks all for the help. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ioan Indreias Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:43 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

At 02:47 AM 10/5/2009, you wrote: TDM04. The original 4 channel card with 4 red cards installed. >Are you series??? >My card is FXO TDM2400, I am sure its designed to forward calls to pstn!!! > > > >At 04:32 PM 10/4/2009, you wrote: > >Hi > >I installed TDM24 card, made ZAP (DAHDI) trunk, and set

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

> > I cant find Zapata.cfg You have a DAHDI installation thus you have to find chan_dahdi.conf. it should be located under /etc/asterisk Regarding the configuration for tones you have to check indications.conf file Best regards, Nini ___ -- Bandwidth

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

Zapata.cfg Thanks again! -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ioan Indreias Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 1:18 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

>> DAHDI/DGTDM24/966505103250 This (DGTDM24) is strange. Could you provide the setup of the DAHDI trunk? You should have something like DAHDI/g0/96 or DAHDI/10/96 Here are more info on this subject: http://www.mail-archive.com/asterisk-users@lists.digium.com/msg226642.html HTH, Ioan (Nin

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing At 04:32 PM 10/4/2009, you wrote: >Hi >I installed TDM24 card, made ZAP (DAHDI) trunk, and set outbound all calls >to that trunk, I am getting all circuits are busy now, do I have to do >something specific?

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

ion (from-internal, 966505103250, 5) exited non-zero on 'SIP/100-08fba098' -- Executing [...@from-internal:1] Macro("SIP/100-08fba098", "hangupcall") in new stack -- Executing [...@macro-hangupcall:1] ResetCDR("SIP/100-08fba098", "w") in new s

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:37:52AM +1100, Paul Hales wrote: > > Is inbound working? Considering he has no channel of type 'ZAP' and he uses Zaptel: no. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

At 04:32 PM 10/4/2009, you wrote: >Hi >I installed TDM24 card, made ZAP (DAHDI) trunk, and set outbound all calls >to that trunk, I am getting all circuits are busy now, do I have to do >something specific?? I am using elastix. Sometimes you can't make a call on DAHDI until a call has been recei

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm outgoing

Is inbound working? Can you see action on the CLI when you send a call to the lines attached to the card? PaulH B.Masoud @ SH wrote: > Hi > I installed TDM24 card, made ZAP (DAHDI) trunk, and set outbound all calls > to that trunk, I am getting all circuits are busy now, do I have to do > some

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm loosing interrupts and latency

On Monday 15 June 2009 20:00:11 Alex Samad wrote: > I have come across a problem, with my tdp410 and soekris board > (basically pc on a chip amd geode cpu). > > How to engage digium to providing a fix for this ? http://www.digium.com/en/supportcenter/ -- Tilghman ___

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm loosing interrupts and latency

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:19:33PM -0500, Lyle Giese wrote: > Alex Samad wrote: > > Hi > > [snip] > > > > as you can see with the interrupts the wctdm24xxp0 is above eth0 (local > > lan) and eth3 (my adsl) > > > > eth1 is wireless and not heavily used > > > > > > So any one had this problems, any

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm loosing interrupts and latency

Alex Samad wrote: > Hi > > I have come across a problem, with my tdp410 and soekris board > (basically pc on a chip amd geode cpu). > > I am using the box as a firewall/asterisk box. The problem occurs when I > drop ppp and I get dead loop dectiotn going, I seem to lose interrupts > and get lots of

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm fxo module always busy

On 10/4/07, chawki hammoud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a digium tdm04B. One fxo module always gives a > faulty busy signal when a call comes in. I swaped > places and re-compiled zaptel with no change. Is this > a faulty fxo or configuration issue. Hi, I suggest you post your related zap

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm fxo module always busy

Hi Chawki, it is not uncommon that FXO or FXS modules do not work even if no error message is shown when wctdm module is loaded. Have you tried to replace/swap your FXO modules? Giorgio chawki hammoud wrote: > Hi: > > > I have a digium tdm04B. One fxo module always gives a > faulty busy signal w

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM bus extension.

On May 29, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2007, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: Not right now. I'd like to see that done, however, I've been mostly focusing on making sure that its current feature set is solid. So it basically just does ISUP? Yes. :-) Matthew Fredric

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM bus extension.

On Tue, 29 May 2007, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: Not right now. I'd like to see that done, however, I've been mostly focusing on making sure that its current feature set is solid. So it basically just does ISUP? -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel:

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM bus extension.

On May 29, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2007, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: SS7 support is in trunk right now. We can always use more testers for the stack :-) Thank you Matthew. Appreciate it. I don't really have any A-links to tap right now, but will get on th

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM bus extension.

On Tue, 29 May 2007, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: SS7 support is in trunk right now. We can always use more testers for the stack :-) Thank you Matthew. Appreciate it. I don't really have any A-links to tap right now, but will get on that ASAP. Does the stack support feature / informat

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM bus extension.

On May 25, 2007, at 4:24 PM, William Moore wrote: On 5/25/07, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In reference to an old post from 2002: http://www.marko.net/asterisk/archives/0203/0103.html How does one go about doing this? I think what mark was referring to there is dynamic spans.

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM bus extension.

On 5/25/07, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 25 May 2007, William Moore wrote: > I think what mark was referring to there is dynamic spans. They > actually work over a standard ethernet network. They are configured in > zaptel.conf and zapata.conf just like any other zaptel dev

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM bus extension.

On Fri, 25 May 2007, William Moore wrote: I think what mark was referring to there is dynamic spans. They actually work over a standard ethernet network. They are configured in zaptel.conf and zapata.conf just like any other zaptel device. Interesting! So Zaptel does have native TDMoE ca

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM bus extension.

On 5/25/07, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In reference to an old post from 2002: http://www.marko.net/asterisk/archives/0203/0103.html How does one go about doing this? I think what mark was referring to there is dynamic spans. They actually work over a standard ethernet network.

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM analog cards, volume, echo, fxotune, ztmonitor and HPEC

Hi, Matt: Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > What version of zaptel are you using fxotune from? You should be using > 1.4 fxotune, between 1.2 and 1.4 there was a pretty significant rewrite > that will probably give you more improvement. Also, just in case you > hadn't, make sure you're doing an fxotu

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM analog cards, volume, echo, fxotune, ztmonitor and HPEC

What version of zaptel are you using fxotune from? You should be using 1.4 fxotune, between 1.2 and 1.4 there was a pretty significant rewrite that will probably give you more improvement. Also, just in case you hadn't, make sure you're doing an fxotune -s on bootup so that it applies you

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM analog cards, volume, echo, fxotune, ztmonitor and HPEC

Hi: Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Just a partial answer: > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:24:18AM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote: >> Hi, everyone: >> Now, standard analog sets have a varistor circuit to compensate for >> these variations in signal level, but it would appear that the TDM cards >> don't incor

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM analog cards, volume, echo, fxotune, ztmonitor and HPEC

Just a partial answer: On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:24:18AM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote: > Hi, everyone: > > I am developing a system using Asterisk, TDM-400 analog cards, analog > lines, and Polycom SIP phones for internal extensions. > > Initially there was bad echo but after a series of efforts,

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM-400, Polycom SIP phones, and echo problems

Ira wrote: > At 02:47 PM 3/14/2007, you wrote: >> - How is the HPEC in dealing with this echo? > > Well, I don't have much of a system, but since I installed the HPEC > there has been no echo on my POTs lines. That makes three positives. HPEC it is, then. I'll let you know how it goes. -Stephen

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM-400, Polycom SIP phones, and echo problems

At 02:47 PM 3/14/2007, you wrote: - How is the HPEC in dealing with this echo? Well, I don't have much of a system, but since I installed the HPEC there has been no echo on my POTs lines. Ira ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.c

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM-400, Polycom SIP phones, and echo problems

On Mar 12, 2007, at 7:12 PM, Stephen Bosch wrote: Hi: I am working on a new system with a TDM-400P card with three FXO modules and one FXS module. The system has been in place for a week. Users are complaining of echo problems. I have noticed this echo myself. It varies in severity. It is s

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM 400P in the UK - doesn't see ringing calls hanging up before answer

Ed W wrote: > Using a TDM400P in the UK nearly works fine, but I have a last remaining > problem in that if the incoming is ringing and then the caller hangs up, > asterisk takes another couple of rings before it spots the hangup. > > This is annoying in that I sometimes get phantom calls late at

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM Cards or PSTN>VOIP Gateways?

Lee Jenkins wrote: OK, I think I may have found the problem for myself at least. Actually, a friend of mine suggested it. Apparently, Asterisk is a little too fast for the card. Placing a "w" in front of the number to insert a pause looks like it did the trick! Dial(ZAP/1/w555) Loo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM Installation error

On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 08:12:40AM -0700, chawki hammoud wrote: > Hi: > > I have three TDMs that were working fine on my > asterisk system. Now I receive an error when I try to > modprobe wcfxs. Something I didn't have before: Which version of zaptel do you try to install? wcfxs of zaptel <= 1.0

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM Installation error

Hi Chawki. Make a test, remove the symbol "wcfxs.ko" in directory /lib/modules/2.6.8.1-12mdk/misc/ and recompile zaptel, libpri and asterisk.   Good job!   Regards   Josué  2006/7/3, chawki hammoud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi:I have three TDMs that were working fine on myasterisk system. Now I receive

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM Fax Problems

Thanks Damon, I have now turned off all echo cancelation on both the lines coming in for fax and the channels to the channel bank that have fax modems/machines. The fax is clearer, but not as clear as it was prior to *. I have an error showing up of  WARNING[2465]: chan_zap.c:3925 zt_handle_event:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM-400 and dialplan -- how to ring a SIP extension *before* answering the PSTN line?

Hmn. Very nice! It works! On the matter of timing -- Asterisk appears to wait two full PSTN rings before it dials the SIP extension. Is there any way we can tighten up this interval? Is that done in the Zap configuration? The driver? The dialplan? Asterisk is waiting for the CallerID, which is

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM-400 and dialplan -- how to ring a SIP extension *before* answering the PSTN line?

Stephen Bosch wrote: Hi, folks: Okay, so here's an idea. I have a TDM-400 card with an FXO card in it connected to the PSTN and a Polycom IP 501 phone. Observe the following simple dialplan for illustration: [incoming] ; incoming calls from the FXO port are directed to this context from zapa

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM-400 and dialplan -- how to ring a SIP extension *before* answering the PSTN line?

Time Bandit wrote: >> > [incoming] >> > ; incoming calls from the FXO port are directed to this context from >> zapata.conf >> > >> > exten => s,1,Answer() >> > exten => s,2,Dial(SIP/polycom) > > Try this > > exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/polycom,20) > exten => s,2,Hangup() > > I think this way, * won't

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM Fax Problems

Turn off echo can for those calls.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Reeves Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:55 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM Fax Problems   I am running into er

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM-400 and dialplan -- how to ring a SIP extension *before* answering the PSTN line?

> [incoming] > ; incoming calls from the FXO port are directed to this context from zapata.conf > > exten => s,1,Answer() > exten => s,2,Dial(SIP/polycom) Try this exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/polycom,20) exten => s,2,Hangup() I think this way, * won't answer the line until your SIP phone answers. If

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM-400 and dialplan -- how to ring a SIP ex tension *before* answering the PSTN line?

Colin Anderson wrote: > the caller is out his money anyway when you call any phone and voicemail > kicks in, although i think on a payphone they give you a 2 or 3 second > window to hang up. That assumes that you are routing to voicemail. That doesn't always apply. Also -- the payphone behaviour

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM-400 and dialplan -- how to ring a SIP ex tension *before* answering the PSTN line?

the caller is out his money anyway when you call any phone and voicemail kicks in, although i think on a payphone they give you a 2 or 3 second window to hang up. Suggest you implement i'm here / i'm away dialplan logic or set the do not disturb button that way when someone calls and the guy is a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM-400 doesn't detect far-end hangup

Stephen Bosch wrote: Hi: I'm using a TDM-400 to terminate PSTN lines at my Asterisk server with kewlstart signalling. When an outside caller calls the server, the TDM-400 goes off-hook and provides a ringing tone to the caller. If the caller hangs up before the receiving party answers the phone

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM PCI Master Abort

Stephen Bosch wrote: Jeremy McNamara wrote: Stephen Bosch wrote: I don't know. I'll have to check. Is that a requirement? Yes - Most absolutely. http://www.digium.com/en/products/hardware/tdm400p.php I've confirmed that the board supports PCI 2.2. I've also update

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM-400 doesn't detect far-end hangup

Stephen Bosch wrote: Hi: I'm using a TDM-400 to terminate PSTN lines at my Asterisk server with kewlstart signalling. When an outside caller calls the server, the TDM-400 goes off-hook and provides a ringing tone to the caller. If the caller hangs up before the receiving party answers the phone

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM PCI Master Abort

Jeremy McNamara wrote: > Stephen Bosch wrote: > >> I don't know. I'll have to check. Is that a requirement? > > > > Yes - Most absolutely. > > > http://www.digium.com/en/products/hardware/tdm400p.php I've confirmed that the board supports PCI 2.2. I've also updated the BIOS on the motherboa

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM PCI Master Abort

Stephen Bosch wrote: I don't know. I'll have to check. Is that a requirement? Yes - Most absolutely. http://www.digium.com/en/products/hardware/tdm400p.php Jeremy McNamara ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Use

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM PCI Master Abort

Jeremy McNamara wrote: > Stephen Bosch wrote: > >> TDM PCI Master Abort > > > > Does that motherboard support PCI v2.2? I don't know. I'll have to check. Is that a requirement? > Have you tried a different slot? No, not yet. I have tried forcing IRQ assignments, but perhaps I need to try a p

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM PCI Master Abort

Stephen Bosch wrote: TDM PCI Master Abort Does that motherboard support PCI v2.2? Have you tried a different slot? Is the MOLEX power connector plugged in? Are the modules fully seated? Jeremy McNamara ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by E

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM

this time (1:0/0/1) -- Executing Goto("SIP/103-a555", "s-CHANUNAVAIL|1") in new stack -- Goto (macro-dialout-trunk,s-CHANUNAVAIL,1) -- Executing NoOp("SIP/103-a555", "Dial failed due to CHANUNAVAIL") in new stack -- Executing Macro("SIP/103-

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM

-- Executing NoOp("SIP/103-a555", "Dial failed due to CHANUNAVAIL") in new stack -- Executing Macro("SIP/103-a555", "outisbusy|") in new stack -- Executing Playback("SIP/103-a555", "all-circuits-busy-now") in new stack -- Pla

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM

-- Executing NoOp("SIP/103-a555", "Dial failed due to CHANUNAVAIL") in new stack -- Executing Macro("SIP/103-a555", "outisbusy|") in new stack -- Executing Playback("SIP/103-a555", "all-circuits-busy-now") in new stack -- Pla

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Novack Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:02 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM Steve Totaro wrote: Is your machine seeing the card? /var/log/messages? Are you loading the zaptel drivers

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM

Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM Steve Totaro wrote: > Is your machine seeing the card? /var/log/messages? Are you loading > the zaptel drivers? modprobe zaptel, modprobe wctdm? > Would he get the ztcfg message if it were not? Is the phone line plu

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM

Debug output is the only way to help you. John Novack wrote: Steve Totaro wrote: Is your machine seeing the card? /var/log/messages? Are you loading the zaptel drivers? modprobe zaptel, modprobe wctdm? Would he get the ztcfg message if it were not? Is the phone line plugged into the corre

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM

Steve Totaro wrote: Is your machine seeing the card? /var/log/messages? Are you loading the zaptel drivers? modprobe zaptel, modprobe wctdm? Would he get the ztcfg message if it were not? Is the phone line plugged into the correct jack? With only one module installed, the other three jacks

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM

Is your machine seeing the card? /var/log/messages? Are you loading the zaptel drivers? modprobe zaptel, modprobe wctdm? Curt Shaffer wrote: The TDM01B is 4 port capable but has only 1 FXO module. I’m running asterisk 1.2.7 and zaptel 1.2.5. I cannot seem to get the TDM01B working. When I do

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM does not disconnect

Hi Vinicius, on this link you have an explanation about your problem. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653/technologies_tech_note09186a00800ae2d1.shtml Basically, you need to know what method your pbx is using for signaling the end of the call, and then, you must to setup the zaptel drive

RE: RE : [Asterisk-Users] TDM 2400 With 24 FXO

Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE : [Asterisk-Users] TDM 2400 With 24 FXO Hello Fernando, I have checked this card with and without hardware echocan : the hardware echocan module does the job better than the zaptel software can do it. I recommand this module without any doubt. But, the echoca

RE : [Asterisk-Users] TDM 2400 With 24 FXO

Hello Fernando, I have checked this card with and without hardware echocan : the hardware echocan module does the job better than the zaptel software can do it. I recommand this module without any doubt. But, the echocan algorithms in zaptel are better and better and the CPUs power grows permanen

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM 400P in Malaysia

Hello,Just follow the instruction on this link and it should workhttp://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=configuration#TDM2XB-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darryl WareSent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 12:23To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM Echo issue

Hello Sacha, While it is not the best solution as far as quality is concerned, I would suggest you at least try the aggressive canceller in zconfig.h.  I put it into use temporarily while I get an external echo can setup.  It takes a bit of getting used to (no simultaneous speech/duplex), ho

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM dial in question

> > I am trying to figure out how to setup asterisk with a TDM400 (TDM04B), so > that the first 3 lines incoming will be answered and the 4th line is just for outgoing > calls but doesnt answer on incoming calls. > The easiest way to do that is to give the channel a weird context name. For

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM versions question

I also have a TDM400P board labelled REV H that reports REV E/F. -Original Message- From: Cirelle Enterprises [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:01 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM versions que

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM versions question

gt; Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM versions question > > > Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > > > >> I have just realized while trying to research asterisk not acking > >> incoming calls that the tdm400b card is stamped rev H, but

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM versions question

Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Cirelle Enterprises wrote: I have just realized while trying to research asterisk not acking incoming calls that the tdm400b card is stamped rev H, but when I issue the zap show status command in the manager interface, it indicates Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F Board 1

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM versions question

Cirelle Enterprises wrote: I have just realized while trying to research asterisk not acking incoming calls that the tdm400b card is stamped rev H, but when I issue the zap show status command in the manager interface, it indicates Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F Board 1 Please contact Digium Techni

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/28/2005 07:52:50 AM: > > > I was able to raise the volume from inaudible to acceptable by > > increasing the RxGain in zapata.conf by 5db. I'd rather not go the > > uncomressed wav route, as it will chew up storage in my email system. > > I know I'm way behind o

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/28/2005 07:52:50 AM: > I was able to raise the volume from inaudible to acceptable by > increasing the RxGain in zapata.conf by 5db. I'd rather not go the > uncomressed wav route, as it will chew up storage in my email system. I know I'm way behind on reading this,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM 400p

On Tuesday 06 September 2005 05:35, Johan van Tongeren wrote: > I have a Digium TDM 400P at several locations. Once and again I'll need > to restart the drivers because there is no ringing. > Does anyone know a fix for this problem? Whoa, whoa, back up a little, I'm drowing in all the information

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM Card FXO Question

> I have a TDM card with one FXO and one FXS. I am trying to make sure I > understand correctly the TX and RX Gain in the Zapata.conf correctly. If > I have a phone cord plugged into an FXO port tied into a POTS line and > boost the TXGain, am I correct in thinking that the audio going back to > t

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:05 -0400, David Brodbeck wrote: [snip] > 2. I believe there are quite possibly two seperate bugs conflated in that > one item. There's the recording format problem (compressed formats are at > -6 or -10 dB compared to uncompressed) and possibly also a TDM-specific > record

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

> -Original Message- > From: Steve Prior [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Here is the text of the last 2 bug comments by MikeJ (who I > would assume > closed the bug). I think there are three issues here: 1. The bug was originally filed as a "feature request" for a feature that would have b

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

> -Original Message- > From: Adam Robins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I was able to raise the volume from inaudible to acceptable by > increasing the RxGain in zapata.conf by 5db. I'd rather not go the > uncomressed wav route, as it will chew up storage in my email system. This is an acc

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

Rich Adamson Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:25 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume > I saw some conversation about this in the archives, but nothing > definitive. > > If a call comes in over

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

> I saw some conversation about this in the archives, but nothing > definitive. > > If a call comes in over a CO line via the TDM400P, the Comedian Mail > recording volume is so low it's inaudible. Calls coming in via SIP or > IAX do not have this problem. > > Does anyone have any information o

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Monday 27 June 2005 14:26, David Brodbeck wrote: There was a bug filed about this. It was marked as a wontfix, as I recall, because no one would step forward with code or $$$. Were either of those the actual reason given in the bug? Honestly, is it asshole day t

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

On Monday 27 June 2005 14:26, David Brodbeck wrote: > There was a bug filed about this. It was marked as a wontfix, as I recall, > because no one would step forward with code or $$$. Were either of those the actual reason given in the bug? Honestly, is it asshole day today or something? -A. __

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

> -Original Message- > From: Adam Robins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I saw some conversation about this in the archives, but nothing > definitive. > > If a call comes in over a CO line via the TDM400P, the Comedian Mail > recording volume is so low it's inaudible. Calls coming in via SIP

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:22:24PM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: > > > P3 1Ghz under Tao Linux 1.0 (2.4 Kenrnel) cvs-stable w/ X101P > > > > --- Results after 66 passes --- > > Best: 1.024461 -- Worst: 1.024420 -- Average: 1.024447 > > > > And on our new gateway box... > > > > P4 3.0 Ghz under Tao

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

> P3 1Ghz under Tao Linux 1.0 (2.4 Kenrnel) cvs-stable w/ X101P > > --- Results after 66 passes --- > Best: 1.024461 -- Worst: 1.024420 -- Average: 1.024447 > > And on our new gateway box... > > P4 3.0 Ghz under Tao Linux 4.0 (2.6 Kernel) cvs-stable w/ TE405P > > --- Results after 106 passes -

  1   2   >