Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-06 Thread Mike Mueller
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:22:24PM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: P3 1Ghz under Tao Linux 1.0 (2.4 Kenrnel) cvs-stable w/ X101P --- Results after 66 passes --- Best: 1.024461 -- Worst: 1.024420 -- Average: 1.024447 And on our new gateway box... P4 3.0 Ghz under Tao Linux 4.0 (2.6

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-05 Thread Greg Boehnlein
P3 1Ghz under Tao Linux 1.0 (2.4 Kenrnel) cvs-stable w/ X101P --- Results after 66 passes --- Best: 1.024461 -- Worst: 1.024420 -- Average: 1.024447 And on our new gateway box... P4 3.0 Ghz under Tao Linux 4.0 (2.6 Kernel) cvs-stable w/ TE405P --- Results after 106 passes --- Best: 1.023967 --

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-05 Thread Rich Adamson
P3 1Ghz under Tao Linux 1.0 (2.4 Kenrnel) cvs-stable w/ X101P --- Results after 66 passes --- Best: 1.024461 -- Worst: 1.024420 -- Average: 1.024447 And on our new gateway box... P4 3.0 Ghz under Tao Linux 4.0 (2.6 Kernel) cvs-stable w/ TE405P --- Results after 106 passes --- Best:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-04 Thread Julian J. M.
I also had problem faxing with spandsp with my old server (Athlon 700 on a VIA chipset). Now I've instaled asterisk on a P4 2.8Ghz (Asus P5P800, btw great board, let's you assign the preferred interrupt for each PCI slot), with 256Mb, and here's what I get (unpatched zttest): (before I never got

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-04 Thread Rich Adamson
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:48 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: TDM X100P card users: Attached is a modified zaptel/zttest.c app called attest-mod.c. It has been modified to report the delay in receiving 8,192 bytes from the TDM card (instead of reporting a percentage). It works with the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-04 Thread Roger Gulbranson
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 06:48 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:48 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: TDM X100P card users: I get average numbers very close to 1.024 (especially if I take some rounding error into account). That's a very good point. Now I'm not sure since the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-04 Thread Rich Adamson
TDM X100P card users: I get average numbers very close to 1.024 (especially if I take some rounding error into account). That's a very good point. Now I'm not sure since the only thing I've got to go by is existing code in zttest.c which implies 8192, and data arrives in 1024

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-04 Thread Roger Gulbranson
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 17:22 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: TDM X100P card users: I get average numbers very close to 1.024 (especially if I take some rounding error into account). That's a very good point. Now I'm not sure since the only thing I've got to go by is existing

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-03 Thread Josiah Bryan
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 11:48 am, Rich Adamson wrote: The design objective of the TDM (and x100p) cards was to transfer 8,192 bytes of data from the card in exactly 1.0 seconds. The above sample indicates my system required 1.023856 seconds to accomplish this, or 23856 microseconds too

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-03 Thread Roger Gulbranson
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:48 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: TDM X100P card users: Attached is a modified zaptel/zttest.c app called attest-mod.c. It has been modified to report the delay in receiving 8,192 bytes from the TDM card (instead of reporting a percentage). It works with the digium

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-03 Thread Dave Cotton
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:48 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: TDM X100P card users: Again much the same result:- On Mandriva Cooker but with vanilla kernel. [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./zttest-mod -v Objective: to read 8192 bytes from TDM card in 1.00 seconds. Opened pseudo zap interface,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-03 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On May 3, 2005 11:48 am, Rich Adamson wrote: TDM X100P card users: TDM400P on a practically unkillable system (P3/700) -- this is the one with shared IRQs and heavy network traffic on that shared IRQ without any appreciable loss in audio quality: --- Results after 192 passes --- Best:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-03 Thread Alexander Lopez
Funny thing is that Faxes over IP (SIP ATA186) and Fax Over Public Internet (FOPI) have worked fine since day one. I even have faxes on DSL lines at my house working glitch free. I have been scared to 'retire' the old OS as it has worked so well. # ./zttest-mod -v Objective: to read 8192

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-03 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On May 3, 2005 01:34 pm, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: T100P on an MSI cheapo P4 mainboard (getting EAGAIN problems from time to time): --- Results after 181 passes --- Best: 1.024127 -- Worst: 1.023902 -- Average: 1.024012 And the TE405P in the exact same motherboard (swapped it out trying to get

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-03 Thread Alexander Lopez
I ran this test on a machine with P3/700 an got same results. See provious post. Is anyone keeping track of this??? Alex # ./zttest-mod -v Objective: to read 8192 bytes from TDM card in 1.00 seconds. Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 bytes in 1.023984 seconds 8192

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM users: modified zttest.c for testing

2005-05-03 Thread Doug Coker
This was on a DELL 750 P4, 3.2Ghz, with Digi 4 port FXO voip-gw1:/usr/src/zaptel# ./zttest-mod.o -v Objective: to read 8192 bytes from TDM card in 1.00 seconds. Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 bytes in 1.023973 seconds 8192 bytes in 1.023972 seconds 8192 bytes in