On Saturday 17 June 2006 10:03, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> Yes, we'd need it on every single box. We had a dedicated voicemail server
> in the first place. I decided to distribute voicemail between all boxes
> because the script that I had that copied the phone registrations over to
> the voicemail
On Saturday 17 June 2006 01:55, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:40:35AM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote:
> > I don't know how big your voicemail system is, but have you considered
> > using Unison to syncronize the vm accross all your servers? I'm
> > deploying multiple servers with two
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 09:31:54PM -0500, Aaron Daniel wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
>
> >Other applications can handle it. Don't see why Asterisk can't. Mount the
> >nfs volume with the -soft option. Do a 'df -k' and you will see that the
> >df command will time out in a
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
Other applications can handle it. Don't see why Asterisk can't. Mount the nfs
volume with the -soft option. Do a 'df -k' and you will see that the df command
will time out in a couple of seconds. Why can't Asterisk do the same?
Just gonna throw ga
From: Ira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 6/17/2006 3:10 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
At 03:44 PM 6/16/2006, you wrote:
> > The
At 03:44 PM 6/16/2006, you wrote:
> The "hanging waiting for NFS volume to become avaiable" is a
> classic NFS
> situation, hardly limited to your little experiment.
Silly question, but how is this different than a hard disk in the
local machine crashing or the router dying or even pulling th
>Are you sure that a ro mounted volume won't behave in the same fashion as a
rw mounted one when the NFS server is >abruptly shut down?
>Have you tried shutting down the NFS server? Does Asterisk recover from
this?
Doug,
I have to say, my system has been working fine, but could not recall if I
a
JR Richardson wrote:
Pococurante! Or Pococurante? Or you're a big fat poco!
Damn Brian, I had to look this word up.
SYLLABICATION: po·co·cu·ran·te
Pronunciation: (pō"kō-koo-ran'tē, -rän'-, -kyoo-; It.pô"kô-kOO-rän'te)
ADJECTIVE: Indifferent; apathetic; nonchalant.
NOUN: One who does not care; a
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 6/17/2006 8:04 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
Pococurante! Or Pococurante? Or you're a big fat poco!
Damn Brian, I had to look this word up.
SYLLABICATION: po·co
ginal Message-
From: Simon Woodhead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 6/17/2006 1:31 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
We use Unison Doug and it
ent: Sat 6/17/2006 1:06 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I don't think unison is a workable solution. It doesn't
Pococurante! Or Pococurante? Or you're a big fat poco!
Damn Brian, I had to look this word up.
SYLLABICATION: po·co·cu·ran·te
Pronunciation: (pō"kō-koo-ran'tē, -rän'-, -kyoo-; It.pô"kô-kOO-rän'te)
ADJECTIVE: Indifferent; apathetic; nonchalant.
NOUN: One who does not care; a careless or indifferen
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:40:35AM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote:
> I don't know how big your voicemail system is, but have you considered using
> Unison to syncronize the vm accross all your servers? I'm deploying multiple
> servers with two vm servers, each sync'ed every 5? minutes. If one fails,
ervers to our cluster.Doug.-Original Message-
From: Mike Diehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Fri 6/16/2006 9:40 AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFSI don
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I don't think unison is a workable solution. It doesn't scale. The network and
system load would increase exponentially as we added asterisk servers to our
cluster.
If you're clustering that many boxes, I'd investigate fibre channel SAN
and GFS. That way, each node of
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:17:53PM -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I have /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail NFS mounted from another server.
> Everything is fine, until I simulate an NFS server failure, by
> shutting down the NFS server process.
>
> At this point, Asterisk becomes almost non-respon
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:49 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
Mike,
Never heard of Unison... do you have a link to it?
Doug.
I'm another Mike but we all answer when calle
: Fri 6/16/2006 9:40 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
I don't know how big your voicemail system is, but have you considered
using
Unison to syncronize
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas Garstang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:49 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
Mike,
Never heard of Unison... do yo
Mike,
Never heard of Unison... do you have a link to it?
Doug.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Diehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 9:41 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voi
I don't know how big your voicemail system is, but have you considered using
Unison to syncronize the vm accross all your servers? I'm deploying multiple
servers with two vm servers, each sync'ed every 5? minutes. If one fails,
the other one should be "good enough."
Just a though,
Mike
On Fr
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:30 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
>
>
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
> >
On 16:14, Fri 16 Jun 06, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> CF...
>
> I tried setting it to 60s, and it delays the same final result. The system
> becomes unresponsive, but it just takes a few more seconds to do it. Looks
> like it's somehow related to Asterisk polling it's voicemail store every
> check
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I hope someone isn't going to tell me that the voicemail
directory going away is going to cause Asterisk to fall in a
heap on the floor.
>>
Brian Capouch wrote:
You never give up on dissing Asterisk, do you, Pococurante?
This would be a
ginal Message-
> From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 4:06 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
>
>
> I'm curious is this might help:
> this is in sip.conf
> ;
Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:40 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
>
>
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>
> >
> > I hope someone isn't going to t
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:40 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
>
>
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:30 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
>
>
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
> >
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I hope someone isn't going to tell me that the voicemail directory going away is going to cause Asterisk to fall in a heap on the floor.
You never give up on dissing Asterisk, do you, Pococurante?
B.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous conten
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I'll give this a try, but what happens when someone tries to access their
voicemail? Common sense would say that THEN the system will fall apart, which
isn't much of a solution.
What do you want it to do?
The "hanging waiting for NFS volume to become avaiable" is a c
ay, June 16, 2006 2:26 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
>
>
> you might want to try autofs to drive the nfs functions.
> it'll make you
> less susceptable as the filesystem won'
you might want to try autofs to drive the nfs functions. it'll make you
less susceptable as the filesystem won't be mounted full time
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I have /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail NFS mounted from another server.
Everything is fine, until I simulate an NFS server failure, by sh
32 matches
Mail list logo
