> (Article auto-converted from unnecessary HTML to nice plain text.)
>
> I ordered an X100P but when I installed the card in it sound it found a
> Wild Card X101P. Whats the difference between
> the 2 and is there certain considerations I have to take or certain
> things to install to make sure t
Hi,
I ordered an X100P but when I installed the card in it sound it found a
Wild Card X101P. Whats the difference between the 2 and is there
certain considerations I have to take or certain things to install to
make sure the X101P works fine? Thanks.
Kevin Walsh wrote:
Richard Airlie [[EM
Richard Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 05:34:12PM +0100, Chris Stenton wrote:
> > 1. don't run 0.5 zaptel driver with asterisk-head it will panic the
> > kernel.
> > 2. I am pretty sure that the current BSD zaptel driver only supports
> > the fxs modules and the x100p ca
Also, OpenBSD is more secure...
my 5c
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
Airlie
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2004 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X101P FXO with RED alarm
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 06
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 06:29:43PM +0100, Kevin Walsh wrote:
> I don't really understand why people struggle with *BSD when everything
> "just works" on GNU/Linux. I see this sort of thing all the time, on
> lots of open source projects.
Well, portability isn't really a bad thing.
For me, I'm al
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 05:34:12PM +0100, Chris Stenton wrote:
> Richard,
>
> 1. don't run 0.5 zaptel driver with asterisk-head it will panic the kernel.
> 2. I am pretty sure that the current BSD zaptel driver only supports the fxs
> modules and the x100p card.
Thanks Chris.
My understanding was
Jason Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:02:56 +0100, Richard Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:55:21PM +0100, Kevin Walsh wrote:
> > > First things first. Scrap the "ports" and build from the latest
> > > CVS source. 0.9 is far to old and b
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X101P FXO with RED alarm
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:55:21PM +0100, Kevin Walsh wrote:
> > Richard Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > First things first. Scrap the "ports" a
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:02:56 +0100, Richard Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:55:21PM +0100, Kevin Walsh wrote:
> > Richard Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > First things first. Scrap the "ports" and build from the latest
> > CVS source. 0.9 is far to old and bug
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:55:21PM +0100, Kevin Walsh wrote:
> Richard Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First things first. Scrap the "ports" and build from the latest
> CVS source. 0.9 is far to old and buggy, and suspect the same of
> the Zaptel driver you have, although I don't use *BSD myse
Eric Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You may need the 3-wire (UK) to 2-wire (US) adapters for the jack the
> X100P is plugged into. I've heard you can get them most anywhere.
>
No - steal the RJ->BT cord off the back of a modem if the X100P didn't
come with a BT plug. It'll work without any a
Richard Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've just added an X101P FXO card to my asterisk machine. The card is
> detected ok but zttool always shows it in a RED alarm state, which I
> understand means that it doesn't detect the line.
>
> I've connected the card via the line socket to my analogue
You may need the 3-wire (UK) to 2-wire (US) adapters for the jack the
X100P is plugged into. I've heard you can get them most anywhere.
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 09:40, Richard Airlie wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just added an X101P FXO card to my asterisk machine. The card is
> detected ok but zttool always
13 matches
Mail list logo
