Ed Guy wrote:
.
You seem to be missing one of the basic premises of bellster: it is an
equitable
sharing network where "The [Calls] you take are equal to the [Calls] you
make."
What about those of us who have the (mis?)fortune to live in homely
exchanges like Monon, Indiana, USA, where nobody want
Jay,
Thanks for the feedback.
You seem to be missing one of the basic premises of bellster: it is an
equitable
sharing network where "The [Calls] you take are equal to the [Calls] you
make."
Route selection is done heuristically favoring the least used of the
most direct (or more fully specified
According to Ed Guy at Bellster
"The most specific routes takes precedence. For example, if you are
calling 1-212-555-1212 first routes for 1-212-555 are checked, then
1-212, then 1 until a non-congested route is found. (The searching is
actually a bit more general -- matching is done on a per
gt; Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] bellster credits problem coming...
>
>
> Jay Austad wrote:
> > Additionally, it's dangerous to allow routes for toll-free
> numbers in
> > the US. Some "adult" lines use toll-free numbers, but have a menu
> > option to c
Jay Austad wrote:
Additionally, it's dangerous to allow routes for toll-free numbers in
the US. Some "adult" lines use toll-free numbers, but have a menu
option to charge the call to your phone bill, even though it's not a 900
number.
Damn that sux! If I had a charge from a tollfree number the
