On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Thanos Koukoulis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Gergo Csibra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 11:57:00 AM, Thanos wrote:
>>
>> > Hello
>>
>> > I have just set up Asterisk Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on a CentOS 5
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Gergo Csibra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 11:57:00 AM, Thanos wrote:
>
> > Hello
>
> > I have just set up Asterisk Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on a CentOS 5.2 machine.
> > I am using the OpenVox B200P ISDN card.
>
> > My problem is that even thou
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Julien Claassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm also still new to this. but perhaps:
> Did you do make examples, or did you have an earlier asterisk
> installation,
> so the configuration files were present? If so did you make sure, that you
> mISDN card
Hi!
I'm also still new to this. but perhaps:
Did you do make examples, or did you have an earlier asterisk installation,
so the configuration files were present? If so did you make sure, that you
mISDN card was properly configured, using:
1. misdn-init scan
2. misdn-init config
3. misdn-ini
Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 11:57:00 AM, Thanos wrote:
> Hello
> I have just set up Asterisk Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on a CentOS 5.2 machine.
> I am using the OpenVox B200P ISDN card.
> My problem is that even though chan_misdn module seems to be loaded
> correctly with
> Asterisk (I can see it using
--- Vieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unable to load module chan_misdn.so
Never mind. I found out it was a permissions problem.
Either asterisk must be run as root or the asterisk
user must be part of the dialout group.
(tweaked /usr/sbin/amportal)
__
Network Configurations
Block D, Surrey Park, Barham Road, Westville, 3610
Helpdesk: (086) 163-8266
Tel: (031) 266-1563
Fax: (031) 266-4206
Sounds like call waiting on the telco side of things. I have it here as
well but asterisk just shows that there is an incoming call on the isdn
line but does
Hi,
I have the same problem, same error but loading modules changes nothing.
I'm using debian sarge and Asterisk 1.2: after compiling asterisk I
launched install-misdn from beronet site.
When I started Asterisk the same error arose:
Nov 30 15:43:06 ERROR[4914]: chan_misdn.c:3455 load_module: Una
2005/11/25, Jose Limeres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yoann,
> I am going through a similar problem you reported in a past posting:
>
> Nov 24 17:49:31 ERROR[9326] chan_misdn.c: Unable to initialize mISDN
> Nov 24 17:49:31 WARNING[9326] loader.c: chan_misdn.so: load_module
> failed, returning -1
> Nov 24
All right, thanks a lot for your answers ! :)
I also contacted beronet support (as they develop chan_misdn)... this
bug is known and should be fixed within a few weeks...
Alleluiiia ;))
I'm compiling with gcc32... hope it runs ! :-)
Cheers,
YLB.
2005/11/25, Kib Eki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
yes, i can confirm this. We had similar problems. FC4 comes with gcc4. We added
gcc3 and recompiled the kernel, asterisk and chan_misdn. Now we can load
chan_misdn.so with crashing the asterisk server.
Johann Steinwendtner wrote:
Make sure that you compile misdnuser with gcc3.x, gcc4 did
not
Make sure that you compile misdnuser with gcc3.x, gcc4 did
not work for me.
Hans
Yoann Le Bihan schrieb:
Jose,
I met so many problems these last 8 days that I don't remember exactly
which config was mine at that time, so I can't testify the answer...
(just for fun : my linux box is having 3 hd
Jose,
I met so many problems these last 8 days that I don't remember exactly
which config was mine at that time, so I can't testify the answer...
(just for fun : my linux box is having 3 hd with a different distro on
each of them and I plug the cable on the hd I want to boot depending
on my mood ;
Yoann,
I am going through a similar problem you reported in a past posting:
Nov 24 17:49:31 ERROR[9326] chan_misdn.c: Unable to initialize mISDN
Nov 24 17:49:31 WARNING[9326] loader.c: chan_misdn.so: load_module
failed, returning -1
Nov 24 17:49:31 WARNING[9326] chan_misdn.c: cb_log called with
ou
This is the /var/log/asterisk/full
May 27 06:51:08 VERBOSE[1107]: [chan_misdn.so]May 27
06:51:08 VERBOSE[1107]: [
chan_misdn.so] => (Channel driver for mISDN Support
(Bri/Pri))
May 27 06:51:08 VERBOSE[1107]: == Parsing
'/etc/asterisk/misdn.conf': May 27 0
6:51:08 VERBOSE[1107]: == Parsing
'/
Can you post the output of your asterisk log file and your initd script for
starting mISDN.
What versions of chan_misdn, ,mISDN and mISDNuser are you using.
Also check to see that /dev/mISDN exists.
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of m
Yes i would like to have a solution with asterisk, hylafax
and misdn.
Em Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:23:03 +0100
Andreas Czerniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> do you need a sending or receiving fax solution ?
>
> Receiving fax via Asterisk and misdn - no problem, but i
> have no sending fax
Hi,
do you need a sending or receiving fax solution ?
Receiving fax via Asterisk and misdn - no problem, but i have no sending
fax solution at this time.
Andreas.
--On Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 15:04 + Anabela Abreu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Was anyone put hylafax working with chan_misdn?
Hi!
> What are the advantages in using mISDN over other solutions?
- it replaces the (rather terrible) isdn4linux of the 2.4 kernels
- works with many many ISDN cards (no need for CAPI drivers or a HFC
chipset)
- most likely implements more ISDN features than bristuff
Haven't used mISDN myself
What are the advantages in using mISDN over other solutions?
If I knew why it was a good idea (like does it have better sound quality than
alternatives?) then I would put the time in to test it, and also improve the
Wiki.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
So if I want NT mode, I need layer 2 and 3 in user
space ?
Exactly.
How can I use the mISDNuser library to works with
asterisk ? I have compiled chan_misdn with mISDNuser.
That should be enough.
A nother question, to connect asterisk to a classic
pbx, what I need ? NT or TE mode ?? ptp mode ?
--- Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> >>>You need to set the layermask when loading the
> card
> >>>driver. For a TE port, use 15 (layer 0-3) and for
> an
> >>>NT port, use 3 (layer 0-1).
>
> >>Thanks, I add layermask in my modprobe script :
>
> >>/sbin/modprobe --ignore-i
Hi,
You need to set the layermask when loading the card
driver. For a TE port, use 15 (layer 0-3) and for an
>>>NT port, use 3 (layer 0-1).
Thanks, I add layermask in my modprobe script :
/sbin/modprobe --ignore-install w6692pci protocol=2
layermask=3
That would be a TE port with the signaling lay
--- bagattin jerome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> --- Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit
> :
> > Hi,
> >
> > > TE Stack
> > > No Upper ID
> > > init_stack: File exists
> >
> > You need to set the layermask when loading the
> card
> > driver. For a TE
> > port, use 15 (layer 0-3) and
--- Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> > TE Stack
> > No Upper ID
> > init_stack: File exists
>
> You need to set the layermask when loading the card
> driver. For a TE
> port, use 15 (layer 0-3) and for an NT port, use 3
> (layer 0-1).
>
> Simon
> _
Hi,
TE Stack
No Upper ID
init_stack: File exists
You need to set the layermask when loading the card driver. For a TE
port, use 15 (layer 0-3) and for an NT port, use 3 (layer 0-1).
Simon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists
Hi
I am just wondering if chan_mISDN is a worthwhile alternative to
zaphfc which I am having issues with. I have 2 hfc-s modem cards
in my asterisk box.
Any comments or advice will be appreciated.
Thanks
Clive
On 19 Oct 2004 at 11:16, Brian West wrote:
> Well the error does give you some clue
Well the error does give you some clue on whats wrong and it's done that way
to give you exactly what you need to do:
Use AST_DEFINE_STATIC rather than AST_MUTEXT_INITIALIZER
Check out the other apps and compare them to chan_mISDN and you'll get what
you need to change.. its only one line if I re
28 matches
Mail list logo
