-Forwarded Message-
From: IEG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk
+ HAM]
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:04:42 -0700
The answer is a multiplexed terminal node controller (TNC) This was the
very thought behind &q
Mike M wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 02:45:47PM -0700, Michael D Schelin wrote:
BUT,
let me tell you about how bad the southern CA. radio site owners are
becoming. We had a 4 day outage at a very large site where one of my
radios is located. None of them care anymore about backup power. Th
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 02:45:47PM -0700, Michael D Schelin wrote:
> BUT,
> let me tell you about how bad the southern CA. radio site owners are
> becoming. We had a 4 day outage at a very large site where one of my
> radios is located. None of them care anymore about backup power. This
> happen
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:02:56AM -0700, Derek Whitten wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 08:44, Mike M wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 04:43:26PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
> > >
> > > Mark Phillips wrote:
> > >
> > > The suggestion that I have is for various areas to have dedicated civil
> >
s with a system like this.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C. Hatton
Humphrey
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 6:23 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: As
iscussion
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 1:37
PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] civil
emergency comms: Asterisk + HAM
Time and time again, emergency action drills take place
in cities to target where their weaknesses are in "crisis" handling.
Usually they involve
iscussionSubject: Re:
[Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk + HAM
Don, I agree with you on many fronts. I come from a radio background
and here in southern cal unless we fall into the sea nothing will take out all
of the communications here including ham because we are not in low lying
> I think the biggest thing that hurts ham radio's ability to react to a
> crisis is the lack of equipment and operators. Most of the traffic we pass
> is "Health and Welfare" with "Logistics" being the second to it.
You might be interested to take a listen to the latest ARRL News -
they give a
second.
-Don
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael D
SchelinSent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:20 PMTo:
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk + HAM
The two be
re-route in a split second.
-Don
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael
D Schelin
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:20 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Aster
namically configured. Asterisk could play a huge role then as it's made
for IP based traffic and could re-route in a split second.
-Don
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael D
SchelinSent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:20 PMTo:
Asterisk Users Mailing
Michael D Schelin wrote:
The two best forms of communications in a real disaster and one always
has been is #1 Ham radio. and #2 satellite telephone. Ham radio is
global and has proven time and time again to be the most reliable when
the infrastructer has been damaged. The U.S government is t
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 08:44, Mike M wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 04:43:26PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
> >
> > Mark Phillips wrote:
> >
> > The suggestion that I have is for various areas to have dedicated civil
> > emergency com units with strategic reserves of fuel (3-4 weeks worth),
> >
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 04:43:26PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> The suggestion that I have is for various areas to have dedicated civil
> emergency com units with strategic reserves of fuel (3-4 weeks worth),
> battery backups, etc. These units would have links (fib
The two best forms of communications in a real disaster and one always
has been is #1 Ham radio. and #2 satellite telephone. Ham radio is
global and has proven time and time again to be the most reliable when
the infrastructer has been damaged. The U.S government is the biggest
user of satelli
Mark Phillips wrote:
Hold on here folks,
I'm guessing that the original poster of this thread isn't a member of
his local RAyNet team.
Whilst I don't profess to be an expert at this I have been doing
emergency radio for quite some time and have seen service at the
Lockerbie bombing, Dockl
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:18:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oops !
> Sorry ! It seems that I have forgotten to replace my french characters as
> "?" by the correct sequence "é" as exemple.
> I have just modify this page and you can probably read it now (but it is in
> french only for now,
ow, it is only the beginning, and I play to see if any HAM's interest.
Best Regards,
73's from F6HQZ,
Francois BERGERET,
France.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Mike M
Envoyé : samedi 10 septembre 2005 22:22
À : asterisk-use
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:08:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Asterisk is "on the air" :
> http://www.hamwlan.net
> http://192.168.1.1/HamWlan.htm (see the second drawing)
>
> 73 !
> F6HQZ,
> Francois BERGERET,
> France.
Excellent.
So you have SIP/IAX clients connecting to a r
rs Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk + HAM
On 08/09/05, Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bloddy 2E's; always wrong.
Mark G7LTT/KC2ENI
I know some G7s who are occasionally wrong, too :-)
Peter G4MJS / 9M6BA
mbre 2005 21:29
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk + HAM
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 15:27, Mike M wrote:
> The disaster in the Gulf coast and the less than optimal initial
> response suggests to me that c
iling List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk + HAM
On 08/09/05, Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bloddy 2E's; always wrong.
>
> Mark G7LTT/KC2ENI
I know some G7s who are occasionally wrong, too :-)
Peter G4MJS /
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:31:06AM -0400, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> Generators require fuel which is always in short supply and batteries
> die out quickly.
Fuel and batteries and power efficient systems need planning and
management. Don't overlook solar panels as an energy source. They
need t
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:46:57PM +0100, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On 09/09/05, Mike M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:28:34PM +, Mike Hemstock wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 15:27, Mike M wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Imagine what a network of systems composed of Ast
Hold on here folks,
I'm guessing that the original poster of this thread isn't a member of
his local RAyNet team.
Whilst I don't profess to be an expert at this I have been doing
emergency radio for quite some time and have seen service at the
Lockerbie bombing, Docklands bomb, Ground Zero (
The operative word here being "occasionally". Of course, bad spelling
doesn't count.
And as for those half baked M3's ...
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 08/09/05, Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bloddy 2E's; always wrong.
Mark G7LTT/KC2ENI
I know some G7s who are occasionally wrong,
On 09/09/05, Mike M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:28:34PM +, Mike Hemstock wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 15:27, Mike M wrote:
> > >
> > > Imagine what a network of systems composed of Asterisk, ham radio, wifi,
> > > generators, batteries, and a reserve of fu
On 08/09/05, Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bloddy 2E's; always wrong.
>
> Mark G7LTT/KC2ENI
I know some G7s who are occasionally wrong, too :-)
Peter G4MJS / 9M6BAA
--
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +44 1296 768003
VoIP: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:28:34PM +, Mike Hemstock wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 September 2005 15:27, Mike M wrote:
> >
> > Imagine what a network of systems composed of Asterisk, ham radio, wifi,
> > generators, batteries, and a reserve of fuel could have done for the
> > Gulf coast. I have all of
Bloddy 2E's; always wrong.
You are thinking of the Alaska channel. You don't have to pay a
particular vehicle tax if your car radio is equipped with 5167.5KHz USB.
Mark G7LTT/KC2ENI
Mike Hemstock wrote:
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 15:27, Mike M wrote:
The disaster in the Gulf coast and th
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 15:27, Mike M wrote:
> The disaster in the Gulf coast and the less than optimal initial
> response suggests to me that citizens must shoulder more responsibility
> for emergency management. Communications loss must have played a large
> role in the failures that occurr
31 matches
Mail list logo
