I get the smaller WAV ( MS compatible gsm compressed format ) files emailed with this config. I
don't want to create the wav (uncompressed format) files but it only works if I keep them.
My working kludge config is thus:
format=WAV|wav49|gsm
Bill
Mark Spencer wrote:
Think scale for those not us
> Think scale for those not using asterisk in the home. MP3 doesn't
> compress that well for speech only, it is overkill. Use gsm and you will
> get almost 8 times compression. Also your disk usage would go down if
> you don't save in so many formats.
If you use WAV instead of wav for your attachm
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 22:45, Brian Capouch wrote:
> Mark Spencer wrote:
> > Actually I'm considering dropping mp3 codec support from Asterisk (of
> > course, we would still keep the "music on hold" and so on which use
> > mpg123). The reason is that mp3 is relatively expensive (even in decode)
> >
> Mark Spencer wrote:
> > Actually I'm considering dropping mp3 codec support from Asterisk (of
> > course, we would still keep the "music on hold" and so on which use
> > mpg123). The reason is that mp3 is relatively expensive (even in
decode)
> > and isn't really appropriate due to its large fra
Mark Spencer wrote:
Actually I'm considering dropping mp3 codec support from Asterisk (of
course, we would still keep the "music on hold" and so on which use
mpg123). The reason is that mp3 is relatively expensive (even in decode)
and isn't really appropriate due to its large frame size and high b
> By the way do all holded channels hear the same signal?
Yes, provided their "musiconhold" class is the same.
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
I didn't mean mp3 or ogg for playback, but emailed voicemail files. The
original wav paths could be could be dumped into a low priority encoding
queue (for that matter any additional conversion could be done in this
fashion).
By the way do all holded channels hear the same signal?
John
> Actuall
Actually I'm considering dropping mp3 codec support from Asterisk (of
course, we would still keep the "music on hold" and so on which use
mpg123). The reason is that mp3 is relatively expensive (even in decode)
and isn't really appropriate due to its large frame size and high bit rate
for telephon
Just out of curiosity, has anyone been working on adding ogg or mp3 encoding
to voicemail? Lame sounds quite good at low bit rates. Anyway, either of
these would probably be good for the email message distribution.
John
>> It appears that the pharsing for the wav49 extension which is .WAV isn't
>
It will work if you put WAV but for some reason you must also include wav or it fails to attach the
correct file to the email.
Bill
Mark Spencer wrote:
It appears that the pharsing for the wav49 extension which is .WAV isn't
correct in app_voicemail.c. I can't attach the wav49 format although gs
> It appears that the pharsing for the wav49 extension which is .WAV isn't
> correct in app_voicemail.c. I can't attach the wav49 format although gsm and
> wav work fine.
What about just putting "WAV" instead of wav49?
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing l
11 matches
Mail list logo
