RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002460 Give that a whirl Bkw -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:46 AM To: splatters Subject: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash

Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Randy Bush
and the patch take19.txt in bug 0002010 does not apply cleanly to the freebsd port of 1.0.1 randy ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West
23, 2004 1:39 PM To: splatters Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1 and the patch take19.txt in bug 0002010 does not apply cleanly to the freebsd port of 1.0.1 randy ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Barton Hodges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1? o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer res_parking.c o wiki search is useless o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7 I've attached an old-school, no frills, double-hash patch

Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Matthew Marlowe
Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches fine although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not send the DTMF to the other side at all. Although hitting ## does get the transfer. Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :) On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:00:38 -0500, Barton Hodges

RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Barton Hodges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches fine although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not send the DTMF to the other side at all. Although hitting ## does get the transfer. Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :) I'm not sure why that is,