On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote:
> so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ??
Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support,
rather than SW support from asterisk.
The Digium HW has yet to be supported in FreeBSD/NetBSD, and Asterisk
doesn't support the VoiceT
ubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
>
>
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote:
> > so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ??
>
> Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of
> Telco HW support,
> rather than SW su
D] On Behalf Of
Tom (UnitedLayer)
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote:
> so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ??
Everything I've seen points to it being
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Troy Settle wrote:
> I know a few people (myself included) are willing to help provide
> incentive funds to get this going.
Maybe we should coordinate to make this an organized effort?
> The big quesiton for Digium: What will it take to get * up to speed and
> the drivers port
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote:
> > so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ??
>
> Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support,
> rather than SW support from asterisk.
I'd like to see the software side compil
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:49:06PM -0700, David Raistrick wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote:
> > > so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ??
> >
> > Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support,
> > rath
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the
> > plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need
> > of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to
> > interface to the land lines,
At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote:
>I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the
>plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need
>of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to
>interface to the land lines, for
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:50:07PM +0100, Fearghas McKay wrote:
> At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote:
> >I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the
> >plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need
> >of the hardware side. I'd u
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:49:45PM -0700, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > however, my real job keeps getting in the way. 8^(
> >
> > if i manage to get it going, then it becomes part of my real job, and things
> > will move more quickly.
>
> Can we bribe you?
t: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:50:07PM +0100, Fearghas McKay wrote:
> > At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote:
> > >I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to
the
> > >plan th
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > Can we bribe you? :)
>
> sure, pay my rent for 3 months and give me a 50" plasma TV to play in the
> background.
Hrm, thats a bit steep for me.
How about 1.5 months, and a goat with fleas?
___
Asterisk-Users mai
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > Can we bribe you? :)
>
> sure, pay my rent for 3 months and give me a 50" plasma TV to play in the
> background.
Is that all? That sounds rather cheap, compared to the things direction
that I'd have to go if I wanted to stick to the cisci CM route, with
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, denon wrote:
> I'd hate to see development efforts get split up, and more time spent on
> porting/etc efforts, detracting from primary development. If it's now
> slowing down new development, it's always a step behind while someone
> patches up the current builds.
Once the cod
With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it happen. I
prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
However, personally I have a few concerns:
Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut .. (sorry Mark, I mean that in
a good way :). I'd hate to see development efforts
I agree 100%. Sometimes code works on one system
because of a "quirk". Building and testing on
multiple systems and debugging the autoconf scripts
has a way of making the code mature and robust. I
keep and old DEC Alpha (a 64 bit machine) and SPARC
(big endian byte order) and run Solaris and Li
> another. I mean, by the time you strip down the linux install to make it
> rock-stable, it's basically a kernel, compiler, and a handful of
> dependances. Does it really matter what OS it runs on at this point, as
> long as it's a robust kernel?
At least in my case, I /can/ strip down a FreeBS
denon wrote:
With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it
happen. I prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
However, personally I have a few concerns:
Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut .. (sorry Mark, I mean that
in a good way :). I'd hate to see develop
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 06:13:02PM -0500, denon wrote:
> With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it happen. I
> prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
>
> However, personally I have a few concerns:
>
> Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut .. (sorry Mark, I
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:02:59AM +0100, Alastair Maw wrote:
> As importantly, we'll get cross-unix portability for less effort. There
> won't be a *BSD port - the autoconf stuff will sort it all out for you.
> Of course, we'll have to do some work to make sure it all functions
> properly, but
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> i've not done an autoconf before, and i suspect it will require not a small
> amount of tweaking.
>
> i suspect the BSD patches will head in the direction of a number of those
> tweaks.
Some of the "patches" that get applied in the normal /usr/ports tree u
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:53 am, Jim Mercer wrote:
> any excentricities the SCO-linux people add to the code can usually
> be ifdef'd back to normality. 8^)
Try the one in acl.c, referencing /proc/net/route. To do the
analogous on FreeBSD, you have to parse kernel internal structures.
Th
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 05:02 am, Alastair Maw wrote:
> denon wrote:
> > With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it
> > happen. I prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
> >
> > However, personally I have a few concerns:
> >
> > Namely, the primary developer is
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Alastair Maw wrote:
> I keep meaning to sort out autoconf/automake stuff for Asterisk. I
> notice that Asterisk is GPLed, so there won't be any licensing issues.
> I'm quite surprised no one else has got round to it before.
>
> Anyway, I have no time at the moment for this, but
Since no one yet has objected to this proposal, could you all move on
from discussing if it should happen, and toward doing something. In the
long run it shouldn't be that big of a deal to make the few changes
necessary. Also if someone jumps in and gets the autoconf started, I'm
sure Mark will be
25 matches
Mail list logo
